And Adolf Hitler was innocent because he was never convicted of anything?Baez has not been convicted of anything. It is a basic tenet of law that a person is entitled to the presumption of innocence until proven guilty.
Baez has spent three years of "preventative detention" in prison. It is also a basic tenet of law that justice delayed is justice denied.
Now he has not been set free. He has been released to home arrest, with a GPS tracker locked around his ankle.
I understand that you gentlemen are strongly anti-K, and you are certainly entitled to your opinions. But basic respect for due process of law, and basic considerations of humane behaviour, must come before personal desire for political retribution. Think about the importance of precedent in law, and remember that if the rules are bent to convict a criminal today, those precedents may be used to convict an innocent man tomorrow.
The scale of corruption of the K governments over twelve years couldn't be much better documented by independent media. You are referring to generally accepted judicial procedures (proven until guilty). This would also require a law system that works, that does not murder or intimidate key witnesses, that does not delay processes, that does not have corrupt judges.
If you in all seriousness wander the streets of Buenos Aires and believe that Baez, Kirchner etc are innocent because they have not been convicted of anything: Wow!