the lawyer says it was a holiday but I think it's irrelevant, it was a visit abroad after a prorroga and more than 90 days stay in Argentina
If the individual received a "prorroga" that means the original 90 day "visa" was actually extended at migraciones?
Any tourist who is granted a 90 prorroga can stay in Argentina for a maximum of180 consecutive days.
If I understand correctly (based on my own experience), they will get an additional 90 days from the date that the prorroga is granted.
But if they leave the country and return before the prorroga expires, they would still have until the prorroga expired to stay in Argentina.
This is the first time I have heard of someone being denied reentry beforethe prorroga actually expired-
Russians can do visa run once, before the first 90 days expire and they will be allowed re-entry and 90 more days.
They cannot get a prorroga of the first 90 days?
But when 90 days from the first entry pass, technically it will be an overstay, even though it's less than 90 days from the second entry.
It will be an overstay after the first 90 days have passed if they do not get a prorroga.
They would still have the 30 day grace period to apply for the prorroga (and pay 50% more) to get one, unless they canot get a prorroga inof the first 90 day visa.
Would be interesting to know from real experience, somehow I think multiple visa runs works for Russians just as well as for others and these rules are not widely known to border control.
Multiple visa runs are very risky and I have no doubt that the border control agents know the rules very well.
Since 2010, visa runs can be considered "abuse of the tourist visa" by any border official who has the power to "judge" the foreigner as a "pseudo tourist" and deny entry, as I previously noted and it can happen the first time a visa run is attempted
If the individual is subject to a maximun stay of 190 days and then must leave the country, making a visa run should always have the same result, if that individual returns too soon.