Reniege, may I ask why we have less and less dollars if we still have (since 2001 and going) a superavit remaining to balance trade? I mean, doesnt that give us enough dollars? we have a surplus of 900 million dollars (november 2013) and it has always been like this in the K era. If dollars doesnt come from international trade, whre do they come from?
Im asking since I really dont know and I supposed that was the main source.
From my understanding, Argentina are not running at a budget surplus (i.e. superavit), but are running a trade surplus (which is what I think you mean by the above).
I only have a high school level of education in economics, but the two are totally separate animals.
CFK will always run a trade surplus, as she locks out the Europeans, the Asians and the Americans in order to protect local business. It is a key component of the model.
This doesn't necessarily mean you have more dollars coming into the country than are leaving the country.
You may bring in USDs with soy exports, but send out more paying off debt / bonds (or any sort of government foreign payment / investment such as new aeroplanes for the airforce etc).
I believe the problem is that the local economy is not being put to work properly by the government. As it is protected (in order to maintain the trade surplus), it is also uncompetitive and not fit to export the things it produces for local use here in Argentina. The result is a one dimensional economy that exports agriculture, whilst everyone here sells empanadas to each other in order to survive (the balance is imported under tight restrictions) and the country slowly leaks capital the whole time.
Putting measures to stem the flow of internet purchases is not going to fix anything. Only slow the inevitable as money slowly drains from the economy via the budget deficit and further capital flight. The trade surplus will just keep locals employed and hopefully happy enough to vote FPV for another term so we can all get led on this merry dance again.