Thanks for the compliment, Pericles
I m naive, this is why i ask questions to grown and knowledgeable people like you
From your point of view, there has been no housing crisis since 2006. This is an outstanding but interesting statement.
Speculation fed by american funds in capital towns all over the world which forced locals out of the centers of activity is something totally natural and to be encouraged. Another interesting debate.
Imho, which obviously differs from yours (i dont make a living off that activity), when an investment yields are negative in real terms, its liquidity nul due to a complex and ever changing tax and juridical environment, the risk is not being rewarded. This might be the reason why the wealthiest argentines prefer to keep their cash away from their own country.
Regarding the free rent argument, once again, it s a question of cost of oportunity. The money stuck in that risky investment could have yieled much more on liquid investment vehicules with similar risks. For example, B bonds in the US or in Europe at the begining of this year that were yielding up to 30% due to the lack of liquidities on the market (credit crunch).
It s all a question of timing. Imho, B As at that time is not very attractive for both international and local investors. Japanese investors that invested on their real estate market in the 90s might testify that housing can be a serious cash trap for a long period of time.
But thanks for your insight, there is always something to be learnt from different points of views, especially when they are free of personal interests.
