There really isn´t anything such as a gay neighbourhood, etc so any of those would be fine, imho I would look for something less touristic like Barrio Norte, Belgrano, Palermo - not soho, bollywood -V
Well, what other criterion should a (presumably) young heterosexual with active hormones employ? No beating about the bush with euphemisms about where a "richer social life can be found." No sirree. It's about getting laid, pure and simple."bjrutledge" said:Do you really choose your neighborhood based on your likelihood of getting laid?
You yourself don't exist, and hence no problem with your sanity. Anyway, enough of this soliloquy."bjrutledge" said:But wait! The post accusing Nashorama of being confrontational has ALSO disappearred!!!
Now I am worrying about my own sanity. Have I only imagined this thread or this forum? What if one by one all other posts in this thread disappear and I am left only with my own responses to non-existant posts?
This thread is now becoming interesting. Of course, an initial post is only an excuse for many of us to develop differing philosophical positions that are often only tenuously related (if at all) to the subject of the original post. And so it is here."bjrutledge" said:I am still puzzled by one thing. If there is no trace of "coachlowe," are we all sure that he ever existed? And if the virtual coachlowe doesn't really exist, can Nashorama be considered confrontational?
In other words, if you confront something that doesn't exist, is that really considered confrontational behavior, worthy of public scorn and social ostracism?
If he was non-existent, there is no cause for alarm. Cause for alarm can only exist if "coachlowe" was a real human being, young, male, and with US citizenship, who has in the interim period either expired or otherwise become ineligible to serve in the fine US armed forces. There is no evidence 1) that he was real and 2) that if he was real, he subsequently expired or became incapacitated. Thus we need not concern ourselves overmuch with USA's capacity to fight other imperialistic wars of aggression.And I have a second concern. The possibly non-existent coachlowe was the only person I have ever known (if I can indeed consider that I knew him, for the brief time I spent reading and replying to his post) who advertised himself as a healthy heterosexual. So now his disappearance alarms me. If healthy heterosexuals are disappearing at a rapid rate, who will be available to fill the ranks of the US military (I don't think gays can be trusted to keep quiet about their sexual orientation, in case of a future draft...)?
How about the hostile and confrontational response of other posters (assuming, of course, that he was and is real).And also, what caused such a healthy person to disappear so quickly???