Yes and I'd say 98%. it's Latin America's lure: real assets in an "averagely" stable environment. Uruguay and Panama/Costa Rica are paramount of that concept, but the latter two are already very much owned by Americans who are desperately trying to sell - spreading the disease.
So I guess the relative economic independence/isolationism/distance (with all the poverty this entails and creates) coupled with the fact that not so many people can get a mortgage in Argentina maintains a more objective value on material stuff.
In Argentina 70% of the population, wouldn't dream of getting a mortgage but actively pursue government handouts, even housing, or even, informally, government land: that's the villas!
The remaining 20% rents and would only dream of home ownership by moving far from Capital (where you need either a gun or a gated community membership).
I guess the ones who actually get mortgages through credicoop or banco hipotecario are the ones with a sure high paying job in this country: that is a mid-top rung bureaucrat that can't be fired and remains behind the desk oblivious to which Government is in power.
Then that other 10% is composed of people who either "made it" or have inherited property in both sides of the socioeconomic spectrum (rich old families; and mid-low families that have not sold in the past 30 years and now own very valuable yet run down houses.
Am I way off?