"peronism" has changed quite a bit since the late 40s.
Peron, himself, was both a military officer, an admirer of Mussolini and Franco, and pretty conservative by todays standards. The Peronists I know today share very few policy opinions with Peron himself.
He cut a complicated deal between the military, the wealthy oligarchs, the church, and the unions.
Current governments have to deal with some of the same players, and many other ones.
The main objection mentioned was nationalizing industries- not really a big part of today's problems- Edenor and Edesur, for instance have long since been privatized, along with most of the oil industry, the electric generation industry, most of the telephone and communications infrastructure, and on and on.
Whats left thats state owned is a pretty short list. YPF to some degree, the water utilities, public television and Banco Nacion. Most european countries have far more government owned industries.
Other than that, this article doesnt talk about what is called Peronism today at all.
For instance, I am currently reading an interesting history of failed public housing projects in Argentina, in which Peron considered tearing down huge swaths of private buildings, and I cant imagine anything like that happening today.
In Modernity for the Masses, Ana María León carefully paints the sociopolitical context from which Bonet’s avant-garde designs emerged.
www.archpaper.com