Thus Spoke Kristina....""

Is Bajo-Cero = Diego Brancatelli? It seems like they are reading from the same script, listen to the first minute of this: http://tn.com.ar/show/basicas/los-sorprendentes-numeros-de-brancatelli-habia-400-mil-personas-en-comodoro-py_665489
 
Cristina used the name of the Red Cross to move funds?

http://www.lemonde.fr/panama-papers/article/2016/04/10/panama-papers-mossack-fonseca-abuse-du-nom-de-la-croix-rouge-pour-cacher-de-l-argent-sale_4899543_4890278.html
 
CFK has requested that judge Bonadio that summoned her to Court be removed and impeached- :rolleyes:
 
CFK has requested that judge Bonadio that summoned her to Court be removed and impeached- :rolleyes:

1. This is the first post in a long while by Rich that doesn't have the trademark ellipsis-exclamation mark...!

2. More to the point, this move by CFK is largely analogous to her government suing the US in the International Court of Justice over the US court system's treatment of the vultures case. It was both absurd on its merits, and had no practical chance of going anywhere - the US must voluntarily accept ICJ jurisdiction in a given case, and that wasn't about to happen. So why do it? Simple - it was political theater for domestic consumption. The message was simple: we have a legitimate grievance against the US, and they won't even accept a challenge.

Same applies in this case almost word for word. Mrs. Kirchner's attack on the judge is without merit, and as a practical matter almost certainly won't go anywhere. So why do it? Same answer: playing to the base. Only a person who is both supremely confident and right would turn on her accuser like that, right? And when the move fails, it will be chalked up to how badly the system is stacked against her.

Heads I win, tails you lose. That this move is transparent to anyone with half a brain, is not a problem: that's not the target crowd.
 
Like Bajo has any credibility give me break a please the dude is K brain washed and delusional why are you even replying to him.
 
Bajo is 100% correct. He didn't say he liked Cristina or is supporting her. In fact, he said the opposite. He simply is expressing his view on her political astuteness and the fallout of a trial that she will turn into a platform. She is a ruthless, master politician and will/can/knows how to use ANYTHING to be in her favor - short of death (and even then I'm not sure). :huh:

In the US we have a married couple that are also ruthless, master politicians. One was President and the other is now running for President. The only difference is that the two of them are amateurs compared to CFK.

Don't confuse your sentiments about / against her with reality.
 
Back
Top