Guest
I corrected Nashorama on Menem. He had commented that he is a Muslim, apparently to ridicule the US for the good relations that existed betwen the US and Argentina during his two terms. As I said, Carlos Menem is a Roman Catholic by conversion.
I don´t see what difference if posters sign in with names as anyone can invent names. What matters is the contents of the postings.
No one surely objects to Nashorama´s enthusiasm, as he says, for Argentina. It seems though that Nashorama´s enthusiasm is linked to his utter contempt for the US. In the case of medical care, Nashorama has nothing but praise for the Argentine state system and nothing but venom for the US system. To me there is no relationship between the two. I think any reasonable person will admit that excellent medical care is something that the Americans do very well. People from all over the world travel to the US for medical care. How the Americans manage payments is another matter and one that is not related to medical care in Argentina. I know Argentina very well and I can tell you that care here in state hospitals is poor whether it be in Formosa or Buenos Aires. As another poster said, there are one or two passable (maybe) public hospitals in BA. That is a sad fact and insisting that care is better than it is is really very demeaning to the Argentine people who deserve better. Nashorama´s attitude seems very paternalistic to me. I can tell you that I´d rather be a welfare patient at a US hospital than a patient at a state hospital in Argentina. Nashorama can argue all he wants about that. I know the facts.
I have read through some of the comments by Nashorama and others in response and see a lot of misinformation by Nashorama. Orwell´s joke was stinging but he has a point that Nashorama has an authoritarian, know-all attitude heavily tinged with hatred of US citizens, Christians and social conservatives.
I´d suggest that Nashorama read a bit more about Argentina, from a variety of sources, not just those of the far left. He should also spend more time here if he is really interested as it takes more than a few months to understand this complex and troubled country.
I don´t see what difference if posters sign in with names as anyone can invent names. What matters is the contents of the postings.
No one surely objects to Nashorama´s enthusiasm, as he says, for Argentina. It seems though that Nashorama´s enthusiasm is linked to his utter contempt for the US. In the case of medical care, Nashorama has nothing but praise for the Argentine state system and nothing but venom for the US system. To me there is no relationship between the two. I think any reasonable person will admit that excellent medical care is something that the Americans do very well. People from all over the world travel to the US for medical care. How the Americans manage payments is another matter and one that is not related to medical care in Argentina. I know Argentina very well and I can tell you that care here in state hospitals is poor whether it be in Formosa or Buenos Aires. As another poster said, there are one or two passable (maybe) public hospitals in BA. That is a sad fact and insisting that care is better than it is is really very demeaning to the Argentine people who deserve better. Nashorama´s attitude seems very paternalistic to me. I can tell you that I´d rather be a welfare patient at a US hospital than a patient at a state hospital in Argentina. Nashorama can argue all he wants about that. I know the facts.
I have read through some of the comments by Nashorama and others in response and see a lot of misinformation by Nashorama. Orwell´s joke was stinging but he has a point that Nashorama has an authoritarian, know-all attitude heavily tinged with hatred of US citizens, Christians and social conservatives.
I´d suggest that Nashorama read a bit more about Argentina, from a variety of sources, not just those of the far left. He should also spend more time here if he is really interested as it takes more than a few months to understand this complex and troubled country.