You guys who have met him should know what he looks like - but I didn't see either saying that the guy you all met as Jack Brooker is not the guy in the photo in the InfoBAE article (regardless of the date of the article). Serafina says the guy doesn't seem like a pervert but doesn't confirm whether the guy she met was the guy in the photo, and Jantango says Nicad is possibly wrong in naming him, but doesn't state that the guy in the photo isn't him either. Of course, 8 years passed from the InfoBAE article and now...
Clarification?
But I must say, the first article talks about this guy being extradited to the US after having fled to Argentina after he skipped parole on his original conviction in the US. The latest La Nacion article talks about them finding the guy, and finding him with various medical implements, but doesn't actually seem to say that he was practicing the same thing again here (of course, I'd imagine he must have been with that paraphernalia)
Well, it does mention the acts he committed, but it's so mixed up that I don't know if they are talking about his US conviction, or what they suspected him of doing here. And curious how they mention "a person" was living under a false name, but don't really mention the suspect. Is this bad writing, have I translated poorly, or what?
So did they end up extraditing the guy in the InfoBAE article 8 years ago? Did he serve out the remainder of his sentence there and then come back here? Was he not extradited in 2006 and has been here, known to the government ever since? Maybe I'm missing something, but it doesn't seem clear to me anything haha.
Clarification?
But I must say, the first article talks about this guy being extradited to the US after having fled to Argentina after he skipped parole on his original conviction in the US. The latest La Nacion article talks about them finding the guy, and finding him with various medical implements, but doesn't actually seem to say that he was practicing the same thing again here (of course, I'd imagine he must have been with that paraphernalia)
En ese domicilio vivía una persona que utilizaba un nombre falso, quien ya tenía una condena por abuso sexual. Según fuentes policiales, se hacía pasar como médico laboral, citaba a médicas y enfermeras, y abusaba de ellas.
A person using a false name lived at this residence, who already had a conviction for sexual abuse. According to police sources, he had passed himself off as an occupational physician, he made appointments with female doctors and nurses and abused them.
Well, it does mention the acts he committed, but it's so mixed up that I don't know if they are talking about his US conviction, or what they suspected him of doing here. And curious how they mention "a person" was living under a false name, but don't really mention the suspect. Is this bad writing, have I translated poorly, or what?
So did they end up extraditing the guy in the InfoBAE article 8 years ago? Did he serve out the remainder of his sentence there and then come back here? Was he not extradited in 2006 and has been here, known to the government ever since? Maybe I'm missing something, but it doesn't seem clear to me anything haha.