jp said:
I can see why they'd do it. Rent to tourists, keep your property in good condition for longer and make about the same as a long term rental.
The biggest reason is because temporary contracts don't fall under the same laws that long-term contracts do and owners can kick people out of their apartments when they don't pay (or stay past the time they paid for), don't require garantias as a result, etc. Much less problems. A bit more headaches though.
There is a good amount of cost in maintaining tourist apartments - at least successful ones. With long term leases, the tenant is responsible for just about everything related to maintaining the apartment. Short term leases, it's all on the owner. The owner also splits commissions and fees with those who manage the property unless they do all the work themselves, and I can almost guarantee those apartments won't be as successful as if they have an agency managing. Of course, as stated, the owner also pays all the services - and short term renters who are not paying the bills don't think about making sure that all the lights are turned out before leaving the apartment, maybe - usually much higher electric and gas bills when someone is occupying their apartment.
You're right in saying the profit comes out about the same - maybe a bit higher with the short term leases though.
The guys I know rent their apartments all year at about 50% occupancy or better. They are managing the apartments for the owners, they advertise, they make sure there are good towels, kitchen utensils, the furniture isn't bashed up, etc, and they have to push the owners to buy these things for the apartments and repair stuff all the time to make sure that the apartment stays in good condition.
There's nothing like tourists who come down to party to make a mess of an apartment real quick...