CASE IN POINT!
Absolutely you can say, Kirchner is an idiot only if you previously showed any criticism of the much worse idiot Trump.
The deafening silence on Trump and the obsessive non-stop criticism of Kirchner is a mal intentioned offensive argument. (not that I like Kirchner, am only using your example).
No one ever claimed Argentina is a zero racism zone. Criticism of Argentine racism is welcome, and we will all join you, only if you previously showed your true concern about much worse racism atrocities elsewhere.
Trump will win again because of the complacency and silence.
But the thread is not about Trump. If we have to clarify our distaste for everything similar or worse than what we are critisizing, every thread will become a megathread.
I don't like Coca Cola, but can I not say that without also clarifying that I didn't like Spar Cola (a brand in my country, the UK) either? Coca Cola is still shit whether Spar Cola was shit or not.
If I were to critisize Trump in this thread, which you seem think is hard to do despite my dislike of Trump across the board, where would I stop? Would someone then be able to say, "how can you critisize Trump when David Duke is worse". Ok, so then to critisize Trump I would also have to critisize David Duke. Wait, Hitler was worse than David Duke, so how can I critisize him without also aiming for Hitler?
Ok, so to critisize the idea of racism in Argentina I have to go on a path like casual racism in this country, critisizing the fact it happens in other countries too, commenting on Trump, then moving to someone worse, then again to someone worse.
None of this is not saying I don't want to critisize Trump. If there was a thread on it I would be all in and while you misquoted him earlier in the thread what he said about infested rats was terrible.