steveinbsas
Registered
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2006
- Messages
- 10,634
- Likes
- 6,895
Thanks, but I probably won't have it for about a year...and nothing is absolutely certain.
Roxana said:Congratulations!!!
Among other things, now you have the right to vote in this country!!
( Probably you are not going to be in the padrones for this next election)
Captain Cheetah said:you clearly don't understand the concept, advantages and importance of dual/multiple citizenships
bigbadwolf said:I don't think the US authorities will let him keep his US citizenship.
steveinbsas said:This is simply not the case. I would have to renounce it to lose it. Argentina does not require that I do so and I think it's possible that the US "authorities" will never even know that I have Argentine citizenship (if it is actually granted), but it's OK with me if they do.
Also, a person who is automatically granted another citizenship does not risk losing U.S. citizenship. However, a person who acquires a foreign citizenship by applying for it may lose U.S. citizenship. In order to lose U.S. citizenship, the law requires that the person must apply for the foreign citizenship voluntarily, by free choice, and with the intention to give up U.S. citizenship.
Intent can be shown by the person's statements or conduct.
The Department has a uniform administrative standard of evidence based on the premise that U.S. citizens intend to retain United States citizenship when they obtain naturalization in a foreign state, subscribe to a declaration of allegiance to a foreign state, serve in the armed forces of a foreign state not engaged in hostilities with the United States, or accept non-policy level employment with a foreign government.
In light of the administrative premise discussed above, a person who:and in so doing wishes to retain U.S. citizenship need not submit prior to the commission of a potentially expatriating act a statement or evidence of his or her intent to retain U.S. citizenship since such an intent will be presumed.
- is naturalized in a foreign country;
- takes a routine oath of allegiance to a foreign state;
- serves in the armed forces of a foreign state not engaged in hostilities with the United States, or
- accepts non-policy level employment with a foreign government,
Bajo_cero2 said:1) In both cases you have to pay taxes. So, here is no difference.
2) Permanent residency allows deportation, there is no deportation for citizens. If you have a criminal issue, DGM starts the deportation procedure. A criminal issue might be a car crash where somebody die for example, you don´t need to be a criminal.
3) Permanent residency can be taken away, citizenship not.
4) Being a foreingner you are not full protected because: discrimination (there are many jobs where you have to be a citizen for being hired, even it can be claimed at Court, you by pass it being a citizen), reciprocity (for example, the US deports 2000 illegal argentinian sending them to jail before deportation, Argentina might do the same).
5) If there is a war: (think in long terms, the world migh change a lot in the next 40 years)
a) having citizenship you are Argentinian in Argentina. If you have permanent residency you might finish in a concentration camp.
b) Having permanent residency you might lose all your money and assets. Confiscation of the property of enemies is standard all around the world. As I mention, having citizenship, here you are Argentinian.
6) If you are legal, the procedure for citizenship is less bourocratic and for free no lawyer needed (YOU DON´T NEED A LAWYER IF YOU HAVE DNI). The procedure for permanent residency is more bourocratic, you have to pay a fee, the translation, the criminal record, etc.
7) When you sell real state you don´t pay the extra tax if you are a citizen.
However, as I always say, citizenship is an strategy I developed for irregulars who don´t full fit the requirements for residency. In your case, it is more a personal desicion.