Bolivia

For some reason? the Argentine TV only interviews Morales supporters? What about the opposition that won the referendum? is being ignored?
An Argentine journalist left them in ridicule with a simple question and from there they attacked them and threatened them with death.

LA NACION - La insólita respuesta del embajador argentino en Bolivia sobre los periodistas evacuados - www.lanacion.com.ar/2306822
 
The progressive left has some interesting analysis.

"Evo Morales, even if he didn't run for president again, was legitimate as leader till December when his term was to end. He was forced to leave by the military before this, and a new leader has been put in place only because she is next in line after everyone else who would have been next in line was forced to resign [through force/threat]..."

They also quote the new president and her tweets, for example: "Sueno con una Bolivia libre de ritos satanicos indigenas, la ciudad no es para los indios que se vayan al alteplano o al chaco".

Sounds legit.



Bolivia is 95% Catholic. What's amazing is not carrying the Bible into the presidential palace but the fact that Morales was able to diminish the influence of the Church in an overwhelmingly Catholic country. Ironically the new Bible toting president is divorced.
 
Bolivia is 95% Catholic. What's amazing is not carrying the Bible into the presidential palace but the fact that Morales was able to diminish the influence of the Church in an overwhelmingly Catholic country. Ironically the new Bible toting president is divorced.

It's not 95% Catholic , it's 76% Catholic.

A lot of that is actually indigeonous-Catholicism. I.e. it's the result of 500 years of religeous colonialisation of the native populations and their pre-existing spiritual beliefs. This was historically, in part, characterised by combining and attempting to overwrite the pre colonial existing belief systems with Christian ones.

So, this 76% stat is more complex than first sight would suggest. It would be a pity to lack nuance and be ahistorical here.

After all, it's only been just over 100 years since other religions have been officially allowed again by the colonial regimes political institutions in Bolivia.

An important reason why the Catholic Church has so much power in Bolivia right now, is that they have the most economic power in the country due to centuries of 'bringing civilization and god' , while stripping the country of it's treasures.

What we are seeing today is related in many ways to this history.

See excerpt of a wiki article below, interesting reading. *Bold added by me for emphasis

"Christianity had its roots in the Spanish conquest; priests accompanied the first military expeditions. The church's organization, personnel, and role in society were all defined early in the colonial era. Pope Julius III created the La Plata bishopric in 1552; this was followed by those of La Paz and Santa Cruz early in the seventeenth century. A plethora of religious orders – Franciscans, Mercedarians, Dominicans, and Jesuits were the most prominent – joined diocesan priests in the colonial ministry. The clergy were largely of European origin. The few mestizos who joined the ranks were usually admitted as lay brothers rather than priests.

The patronato real (an agreement between the Catholic Church and the Spanish crown) gave the Spanish throne and, by extension, the colonial authorities significant powers in church affairs. Appointments of clergy and bishops normally required the approval of civil authorities. The relationship between church and state was mutual and intimate; each institution had great influence on the other's affairs. In a society where separation from the religious ministrations of the church was unthinkable, the church had great moral influence.

In addition, the colonial church was an extremely wealthy institution. Religious organizations not only owned extensive tracts of land but also served as quasi-official moneylenders to the landed elite and high-ranking officeholders. By the end of the colonial era, a combination of money lending and shrewd real estate investments had made the church the dominant financial power in Bolivia.

IndependenceEdit


St. Francis Basilica, La Paz, from 1700s
Independence in 1825 brought some changes to Bolivian church-state relations, though the Roman Catholic Church retained its status as the nation's sole religion
. Except for a brief period during the 1870s, this pattern continued throughout the nineteenth century. At the same time, however, the new Bolivian government quickly asserted its primacy over the church. In 1826 President Antonio José de Sucre Alcalá (1825–28) took control over the collection of church tithes, closed all monasteries with fewer than twelve persons, and seized church lands. These actions permanently weakened the church as a political force.

Further changes occurred in the twentieth century. In 1906 the government proclaimed religious toleration and permitted the establishment of non-Roman Catholic churches. In 1961 the government relinquished its right under the patronato nacional (the successor to the patronato real) to mediate in church affairs. No longer could the government have a voice in conciliar decrees, briefs, or bulls that the pope issued or play a role in the selection of high-ranking church officials. The Constitution of 1967 grants official status to the Roman Catholic Church but also guarantees the public exercise of all other religions.

Freed from direct government control, the Roman Catholic Church in the 1960s attempted to establish a more visible presence in Bolivian society. The country's bishops, organized into the Bolivian Bishops Conference (Conferencia Episcopal Boliviana), issued pastoral letters condemning the living conditions of peasants and workers. The bishops established development centers, research organizations, and commissions to address these problems. Many priests, brothers, and sisters took a more direct political stance. The so-called miner priests – oblates assigned to parishes in mining communities – actively defended workers' rights. This experience led to the formation in 1968 of Church and Society in Latin America-Bolivia (Iglesia y Sociedad en América Latina-Bolivia – ISAL-Bolivia). Employing a Marxist analysis of society, ISAL-Bolivia endorsed socialism as the only means of achieving justice.

Continues...
 
The political stance of ISAL-Bolivia and others engendered a sharp response from the bishops. Shortly after ISAL-Bolivia contended that capitalism had contaminated the church, the CEB stripped the organization of its official Catholic status. In a subsequent pastoral letter, the bishops stated that although priests had an obligation to promote needed social change, they could not identify with specific political parties or movements. The church hierarchy's caution was evident in its handling of the Bolivian Justice and Peace Commission. Established in 1973 as a research arm of the episcopate, the commission quickly became active in defending the rights of political prisoners of the military government led by Colonel Hugo Banzer Suárez. The government accused the commission of promoting subversive propaganda and deported the organization's key personnel.[4] In their response, the bishops endorsed the commission's human rights agenda but then suspended its operations for two years. The reconstituted commission operated under tighter episcopal controls than did its predecessor.

The return of democracy in the 1980s presented the church with a new set of challenges. Although the CEB recognized that the economic crisis of the early and mid-1980s required strong measures, it publicly questioned the wisdom of the stabilization policies adopted in 1985 by President Víctor Paz Estenssoro. Endorsing the position adopted at the Latin American Bishops Conference in Puebla, Mexico, in 1979, the CEB suggested that Paz Estenssoro's New Economic Policy (Nueva Política Económica – NPE) would generate increasing levels of inequality in society. The bishops followed up this pastoral letter by mediating negotiations in 1986 between the government and the Bolivian Labor Federation (Central Obrera Boliviana).

In 1986 the Roman Catholic Church was organized into four archdioceses (La Paz, Santa Cruz, Cochabamba, and Sucre), four dioceses, two territorial prelatures and six apostolic vicariates. The bishops had at their disposal approximately 750 priests, most of whom were foreigners. The paucity of priests significantly hampered church activities. For example, the archdiocese of Sucre only had sixty-two priests to attend to the needs of an estimated 532,000 Catholics dispersed over 50,000 square kilometers.

Because of the church's weak rural presence, the vast majority of Indians followed their own brand of folk-Catholicism far removed from orthodoxy. Indians saw no inconsistency in mixing professed Roman Catholicism with folk curers or indigenous ritual. Indigenous rituals and fragments of Roman Catholic worship were interwoven in the elaborate fiestas that were the focus of social life.

The Quechua and Aymara pantheon was a mix of Christian and pre-conquest spirits and beings. A deity like the virginal daughter of the Inca sun god was transmuted into the Virgin Mary. Many of the supernaturals were linked to a specific place, such as lake and mountain spirits. The earth mother, Pachamama, and fertility rituals played a prominent role..."


Cheers!

 
A little.more analysis from the progressive left on the "illegitimate new president".

 
It's not 95% Catholic , it's 76% Catholic.

A lot of that is actually indigeonous-Catholicism. I.e. it's the result of 500 years of religeous colonialisation of the native populations and their pre-existing spiritual beliefs. This was historically, in part, characterised by combining and attempting to overwrite the pre colonial existing belief systems with Christian ones.

So, this 76% stat is more complex than first sight would suggest. It would be a pity to lack nuance and be ahistorical here.

After all, it's only been just over 100 years since other religions have been officially allowed again by the colonial regimes political institutions in Bolivia.

An important reason why the Catholic Church has so much power in Bolivia right now, is that they have the most economic power in the country due to centuries of 'bringing civilization and god' , while stripping the country of it's treasures.

What we are seeing today is related in many ways to this history.

See excerpt of a wiki article below, interesting reading. *Bold added by me for emphasis

"Christianity had its roots in the Spanish conquest; priests accompanied the first military expeditions. The church's organization, personnel, and role in society were all defined early in the colonial era. Pope Julius III created the La Plata bishopric in 1552; this was followed by those of La Paz and Santa Cruz early in the seventeenth century. A plethora of religious orders – Franciscans, Mercedarians, Dominicans, and Jesuits were the most prominent – joined diocesan priests in the colonial ministry. The clergy were largely of European origin. The few mestizos who joined the ranks were usually admitted as lay brothers rather than priests.

The patronato real (an agreement between the Catholic Church and the Spanish crown) gave the Spanish throne and, by extension, the colonial authorities significant powers in church affairs. Appointments of clergy and bishops normally required the approval of civil authorities. The relationship between church and state was mutual and intimate; each institution had great influence on the other's affairs. In a society where separation from the religious ministrations of the church was unthinkable, the church had great moral influence.

In addition, the colonial church was an extremely wealthy institution. Religious organizations not only owned extensive tracts of land but also served as quasi-official moneylenders to the landed elite and high-ranking officeholders. By the end of the colonial era, a combination of money lending and shrewd real estate investments had made the church the dominant financial power in Bolivia.

IndependenceEdit


St. Francis Basilica, La Paz, from 1700s
Independence in 1825 brought some changes to Bolivian church-state relations, though the Roman Catholic Church retained its status as the nation's sole religion
. Except for a brief period during the 1870s, this pattern continued throughout the nineteenth century. At the same time, however, the new Bolivian government quickly asserted its primacy over the church. In 1826 President Antonio José de Sucre Alcalá (1825–28) took control over the collection of church tithes, closed all monasteries with fewer than twelve persons, and seized church lands. These actions permanently weakened the church as a political force.

Further changes occurred in the twentieth century. In 1906 the government proclaimed religious toleration and permitted the establishment of non-Roman Catholic churches. In 1961 the government relinquished its right under the patronato nacional (the successor to the patronato real) to mediate in church affairs. No longer could the government have a voice in conciliar decrees, briefs, or bulls that the pope issued or play a role in the selection of high-ranking church officials. The Constitution of 1967 grants official status to the Roman Catholic Church but also guarantees the public exercise of all other religions.

Freed from direct government control, the Roman Catholic Church in the 1960s attempted to establish a more visible presence in Bolivian society. The country's bishops, organized into the Bolivian Bishops Conference (Conferencia Episcopal Boliviana), issued pastoral letters condemning the living conditions of peasants and workers. The bishops established development centers, research organizations, and commissions to address these problems. Many priests, brothers, and sisters took a more direct political stance. The so-called miner priests – oblates assigned to parishes in mining communities – actively defended workers' rights. This experience led to the formation in 1968 of Church and Society in Latin America-Bolivia (Iglesia y Sociedad en América Latina-Bolivia – ISAL-Bolivia). Employing a Marxist analysis of society, ISAL-Bolivia endorsed socialism as the only means of achieving justice.

Continues...

I don't doubt that Catholicism has absorbed some indigenous aspects. This is also the case in other parts of the world such as Africa where Catholic liturgy, for example, incorporates aspects of local culture. And even in the developed world Catholicism is not the same everywhere. Catholicism in Germany, for example, is far more liberal than in the US. We might call this too indigenous Catholicism. The fact that Catholicism supplanted pre-existing religions is irrelevant. The same can be said of Islam. So what? The fact is that Catholicism is dominant in Bolivia.
 
For some reason? the Argentine TV only interviews Morales supporters? What about the opposition that won the referendum? is being ignored?
A sad sign of things to come in Argentina, under the new Fernandez duo.
 
For some reason? the Argentine TV only interviews Morales supporters? What about the opposition that won the referendum? is being ignored?

In my opinion, that is not entirely accurate. The prime time ARG Tv channels, La Nacion+, TN, A24 and Canal 26, have provided ample coverage re: both sides of the spectrum.
 
Back
Top