Bajo_cero2
Registered
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2010
- Messages
- 7,940
- Likes
- 4,363
Your reasoning is again flawed ...!! According to Professor Samuelson Nobel Prize winner , he stated that there always will be people between jobs making Zero unemployment impossible !
Nothing to do with the the size of the population....! For example if the unemployment in Chaco is 6 % on a given month, comes the harvest then 20,000 laborers are needed , so Bolivians an Paraguayans come in to fill those jobs. So what happened to the unemployed prior to the harvest???? vanished?
Chaco is complex because they have native population, about 60.000 quoms (http://es.wikipedia....antidad_de_Qoms) but there are other tribes too. I read an article I cannot find now where they critize the zero unemployment because there is a lot of people not looking for a job there. They are not included in statics and they assert that, if you include them, the unemployment would be 20%. However, this people are native who follow his ancient way of life and they are not interested about looking for a job.
Regarding your comment, there are not general rules you can apply world wide. When you have a particular situation, you have to study it in order to find out its own rule. Japan economy is a good example where the classic economy "rules" doesn´t work out. So, when the harvest happens, this 6% you mention get a job plus the other 350.000 golondrina workers this country has, plus the golondrinas who comes from border countries. So, 350.000 golondrinas workers over a population of 1.000.000 people makes a big difference, doesn´t it?. Add the workers of Bolivia and Paraguay we have no information about.