Folks,
My theory is that anyone who has feedline from Rothschild and K, will dance appropriately to prescribed figures.
Look behind the scene and you'll see who's choreographer. Look on surroundings, key-figures of the Cabinet, Congress, Department of State.
So truly right guy for the change seems to be Ralf Nader. Dr.Ron Paul is constitutionist, officially republican and in my humble opinion they should be joining forces for good.
But Mr. Nader will never make in President's chair just bc his programs are clearly harmful for the "big dogs".
He clearly understand "uniqueness" of the Federal Reserve, LLC., war crimes, corruption, lobbying, protectionism, etc. The only point of their campaign survey I would not take under consideration is "Israel-Palestine issue". This is not American soil and should be never supported.
Israelies pumped enough money from the US, so it is time to let them deal with they own problems.
But now Mr. Obama all these characters to work on "changes" (???)
Are we going to change this
http://www.lovearth.net/therealcostofussupportforisrael.htm#cost or will continue?
Read this "...But what I've never seen, and don't recall ever hearing about, is the spectacle of a spy for a foreign country being hired by any organization that hopes to influence U.S. foreign policy. Well, here's one for the record books: the Middle East Forum has hired Steve Rosen, once the head of policy development for the America Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Rosen is accused of stealing highly classified information from the U.S. government and passing it on to Israeli government officials...." (
http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=13819)
And who's dealing at the table?
Look at every important and not so key department and I bet your treasured ... thing there is one just like him.
No, I am not started racial war in here, I just scrolling thrue the facts.
Look where they took the country with all their "bright individuals" like Greenspan or similar ilk. (
http://home.att.net/~mwhodges/debt.htm)
Who took the country into 16th Amendment? (
http://www.thelawthatneverwas.com/new/home.asp)
And with all this in mind I evenly suspect that Mr. Nader is also set for his position by the same group, as a "steam pressure valve". But, hey, it may be a clinical paranoia.
Yes, he has not much tv time for his announcements and campaign but they show him on C-SPAN, MSNBC a few times. So the same about Dr. Ron Paul. How many times we need to observe in order to get a "picture"?
Personally I feel that more buzz around an "official candidate" - more speculations and suspicion it raise. Plus, freedom of the Internet, books, radio. Everyone should have pretty clear picture of "major party candidates" before make cross-marks on ballot.
Yes, there are some technics widely used by SMI to brainfeed a public but I personally respect myself and have no memory slot available for official BS.
So shall everyone.