Democratic Primary Debate Tonight Live 9PM Buenos Aires time.

Status
Not open for further replies.
But I wasn't responding to you, I was responding to DeadOA. You seems to totally generalise and suggest that socialists are simply the poor in society. Is this true in the States or does it again just fit with your narrative?

Of course healthcare will have to be paid for through taxes, such as roads and any other infrastructure or program. This is so obvious but you insist on trying to discredit and dumb down any counter to your thoughts by claiming some kind of fantasy world that others of different mind live in.

Socialism is both a political and economic ideal, I really cannot see how you can say it is simply just economic. I think this just shows your lack of understanding for socialism, know thy enemy and all that.

Is that what you are now asking me, to explain socialism? Or is this another dumbing down and sweeping generalisation of what you believe to be inferior section of the populous to yourself?

Its very hard to have political discourse with someone who tries to just discredit and in turn crates a position whereby the opposition to your perfectly valid reasoning just wastes their time defending themselves rather than having any kind of meaningful discussion on furthering the debate.
 
Its very hard to have political discourse with someone who tries to just discredit and in turn crates a position whereby the opposition to your perfectly valid reasoning just wastes their time defending themselves rather than having any kind of meaningful discussion on furthering the debate.

I think you are too kind. This isn't the bug, it's the feature. After a point it becomes clear that certain posters are simply disingenuous and trying to propagandize. Even if we are kind and assume they are genuine but ignorant and swept up In their delusional narratives. It becomes pointless engaging, the only move left becomes to mock, deride, and discredit them publicly as much as possible. This then at least will make their dangerous rhetoric seem foolish and idiotic and lessen the potential it has for swaying the impressionable readers at whom it is aimed.

Substantive criticism and logical discourse is always the first choice, but against 'alternative facts' presented by the the right wing,regressive, neo liberal, corporatist, anti democratic hegemonists, there is little point.

In fact, they count on those they see as their idiological enemys' taking their quasi-logical smoke and mirrors as something worth engaging with.

Or am I being too cynical...

:p

Tldr: don't feed the trolls, just treat them as the clowns they are.
 
Here's a question. It's a loaded question, but it still a question.

If people are going to advocate for an economic philosophy, shouldn't they understand economics?

Or is it just enough to want free stuff?
What part of Medicare for All would be free, exactly?
 
I was disappointed by AOC's recent endorsement of Bernie Sanders. Although Bernie is a good communist of long standing, he's still an OLD WHITE DUDE.... ugh. It's time for Bernie to pass the baton to AOC or Irhan.
 
I think this is correct.
In fact, if you’re a Democrat there’s no reason at all to run in the Democratic primary. You are just helping Trump win.
Really, it should be illegal for Democrats to run in Democrat primaries.
It should be open only to Republicans who don’t hate America like Democrats do.
turn off Fox and take your meds. You'll feel better.
 
I was disappointed by AOC's recent endorsement of Bernie Sanders. Although Bernie is a good communist of long standing, he's still an OLD WHITE DUDE.... ugh. It's time for Bernie to pass the baton to AOC or Irhan.
This is undoubtedly the most ageist, racist, and sexist comment I've read in this forum in the past thirteen years...

...or any where else in the past 50 (my adult lifetime).
 
Racism Against White People Doesn't Exist.

"In a system of white supremacy, which is what America was founded on and continues to be, it is impossible to be truly racist against white people. Here’s why:"

 
ageist, racist, and sexist

I don't think its entirely ageist to worry about a candidate's age in this particular context. I would be broadly very sympathetic to Bernie Sanders' policy platform, but he's 78 and just had a heart attack ...
 
Inth
turn off Fox and take your meds. You'll feel better.

It appears I’ve triggered Poe’s Law, again.

PS judging by the number of unironic likes that post got, sounds like you’re not the first.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top