steveinbsas
Registered
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2006
- Messages
- 10,544
- Likes
- 6,744
Perhaps the lawyer who represented the pregnant women can expain his use of the expression "constitutional precedent" (if I remember correcty, in at least one of his post about the incident).This is not the US and British common law. Legal precedents here (as in Europe) are not only nonebinding, but can easily be replaced by another precedent either by a judge at the same level, or at a higher level. The only way this would constitute a constitutional precedent is if the decision was taken by the constitutional court. Obviously, in this instance, this is not the case.