Denied Digital Nomad Visa - My Experience

[Jtee125]

Also, paying the overstay fee is cheaper than the digital nomad application fee

 

[lunar]

Just tell migraciones that you already.live in Argentina

And then, while being escorted back onto the plane by two friendly immigration officers, you will be able to successfully enter your habeas corpus plea on your own. After that, you will be brought to a kind judge in Ezeiza, who will determine that this healthy-looking white guy from a first-world country should be allowed into the country for humanitarian reasons. Yeah, right. Good luck with that.

 

[ventanilla]

Where is the site to apply for the digital nomad visa? I can find sites promoting it but nothing about the actual official migraciones application.

 

[devilclam]

Good luck - when I applied in November the site was really buggy and then they lost my application for three months

Tramitación de Ingreso Electrónica - Nómadas digitales

Disposición DNM N° 758/2022

www.argentina.gob.ar

 

[earlyretirement]

I'd never even bother with this. Argentina is one of the easiest countries in the world to be a "perma-tourist".

 

[Jteee]

12,500 pesos, approx. 30 USD.

Cuadro Tasas Migratorias - Decreto 285/2021

www.argentina.gob.ar

Is this still up to date? Want to have enough pesos on hand just in case before I fly

 

[steveinbsas]

The digital nomad visa is that a VISA. If you are in Argentina you need to apply for change of category.

As noted in the first post of this thread, if you are in Argentina, the digital nomad visa will not be granted.

If I understand correctly, it is not possible to change the category of a "visa transitoria" to a "visa transitoria." as they are the same category.

Just overstay and pay the fine.

As I wrote in post three of this thread:

Crossing the border to get a new 90 day visa is not necessary.

Neither is getting an extension if you plan to overstay

Just overstay and pay the fine when you leave

Overstaying once is not a big deal. Just don't make it a habit. After 3 times you might be denied entry. But once is fine.

Overstaying several (if not many) times may no longer be an issue if case of the pregnant Russian women has set a Constitutional precedent.

Based on the prescedent created by.the case of the pregnant Russian women, a history of overstaying.may no longer be an issue.

If that is the case,those individuals reentering Argentina should able to claim (delare) that they are a resident, regardless.of their status with migraciones.

Hopefully, more will soon be knowm...

 

[lunar]

Overstaying several (if not many) times may no longer be an issue if case of the pregnant Russian women has set a Constitutional precedent.

Although you keep repeating it here, I do not believe that's what actually happened.

The judge ordered the release of these women on humanitarian grounds, as they had been held at the airport in inappropriate for pregnant women conditions for a long time. He did not indicate in any way that they had a constitutional right to be here.

 

[steveinbsas]

Although you keep repeating it here, I do not believe that's what actually happened.

The judge ordered the release of these women on humanitarian grounds, as they had been held at the airport in inappropriate for pregnant women conditions for a long time. He did not indicate in any way that they had a constitutional right to be here.

Even if the judge did not "indicate in any way" that the women had a "contitutional right" to be in Argentina, the lawyer who represented the pregnant Russian women posted here, that the judges decision set a "constitutional precedent"for anyone who wanted to come to Argentina to live (and apply for citizenship), regardless of thier status with Argentine migraciones.

It makes perfect sense to me that migraciones would not want the release of the woman to be construed as a "constitutional preceedent" as opposed to"humanitarian grounds" as that would deal a serious blow to their authority.

I hope that lawyer will correct me if I am wrong about what he posted on the subject, especially the assertion that anyone who has overstayed their tourist visa can now tell migraciones that they "already live here" when returning.

.

 

[dsp27]

Even if the judge did not "indicate in any way" that the women had a "contitutional right" to be in Argentina, the lawyer who represented the pregnant Russian women posted here, that the judges decision set a "constitutional precedent"for anyone who wanted to come to Argentina to live (and apply for citizenship), regardless of thier status with Argentine migraciones.

It makes perfect sense to me that migraciones would not want the release of the woman to be construed as a "constitutional preceedent" as opposed to"humanitarian grounds" as that would deal a serious blow to their authority.

I hope that lawyer will correct me if I am wrong about what he posted on the subject, especially the assertion that anyone who has overstayed their tourist visa can now tell migraciones that they "already live here" when returning.

.

This is not the US and British common law. Legal precedents here (as in Europe) are not only nonebinding, but can easily be replaced by another precedent either by a judge at the same level, or at a higher level. The only way this would constitute a constitutional precedent is if the decision was taken by the constitutional court. Obviously, in this instance, this is not the case.