First Jury In Argentine History.

[RodalfoWalsh]

I think jury trials would be good for answers civil cases, cases regarding corruption, and cases of judicial review.

 

[Jaredberryman]

Usually, in jury trials, the jury is chosen and the trial starts. This means you would have to find a way to get to the jurors and bribe them once a trial starts. That's a very short window. The judge, however, is over the whole process and it can take a while. Plus usually the jury is sequestered off from people, especially in cases where there is a lot of press. It's not impossible to bribe a jury, but neither is it so easy. It's not too difficult to bribe a judge though.

 

[ElQueso]

I believe a jury trial makes much more sense than putting all the power to decide a man's fate in the hands of an employee of any government, much less in the hands of just one person, appeals or no after the fact.. I like the idea of distributing power away from any one person as much as possible, particularly when a person's life is in the balance.