The conversation should be why were Deutsche Bank and other Crony Capitalists bailed out at the expense of the European taxpayer.
Because banks hedge their assets. That is their function to generate wealth. Let me try to explain.
Suppose person A has 100 euro.
SCENARIO 1:
Person A can keep this money under his mattress, but then the 100 euro stays 100 euro and nothing happens.
SCENARIO 2:
Person A brings the 100 euro to the bank and earns interest on it
The bank lends 95 euro of the 100 euro to person B, so the bank earns interest for Person A and itself.
Person B buys services and goods for 95 euro from person C to run a business, so it can earn money for a living and to pay the interest to the bank
Person C brings the 95 euro to the bank and earns interest on it.
The bank lends 90 euro of the 95 euro to person D, so the bank earns interest for Person C and itself.
Person D buys services and goods for 90 euro from person E to run a business, so it can earn money for a living and to pay the interest to the bank
Person E brings the 90 euro to the bank and earns interest on it.
The bank lends 85 euro of the 90 euro to person F, so the bank earns interest for Person E and itself.
Person F buys services and goods for 85 euro from person G to run a business, so it can earn money for a living and to pay the interest to the bank
Person G decides to keep the 85 euro under his mattress.
In this scenario, Person A, B, C, D, E and F and the bank are all earning money, either through interest or through running a business.
Before new earnings come in, the total wealth of everyone is
100 euro (deposit of person A at the bank)
+ 95 euro (deposit of person C at the bank)
+ 90 euro (deposit of person E at the bank)
+ 85 euro (cash under the mattress of person G)
= 370 euro
There is only 100 euro cash in existence. The wealth is higher than 100 euro, because banks generate wealth through lending.
Though banks carry a risk.
Suppose person E needs 20 euro immediately.
SCENARIO 2a:
He goes to the bank and requests for 20 euro. The bank can only give him 15 euro and then goes bust, because it does not have any money left. Because the bank goes bust, every account holder loses his wealth.
After the bank goes bust, the total wealth is 100 euro: 15 euro withdrawn by person E from the bank and 85 euro under the mattress of person G.
SCENARIO 2b:
He goes to the bank and requests for 20 euro. The bank has only 15 euro, however the government jumps in and bails the bank out for 10 euro, the bank has now 25 euro in cash, but person A, B, C, D, E, F and G have 10 euro more in tax debt. In any case, person E gets its 20 euro in cash and still has a deposit from 70 euro at the bank.
The total wealth is now:
100 euro (deposit of person A at the bank)
+ 95 euro (deposit of person C at the bank)
+ 70 euro (deposit of person E at the bank)
+ 20 euro (cash under the mattress of person E)
+ 85 euro (cash under the mattress of person G)
- 10 euro (bail out debt)
= 360 euro
It is far cheaper for the taxpayer if banks are bailed out than if banks go bust! Banks that go bust lead to a massive destruction of wealth!