It’s refreshing to see so many respondents attributing Argentina’s downfall to the criminality of its own political leaders and their local commercial partners. It’s been an interesting journey learning how far the tentacles of corruption reach, killing competition in its wake. Speaking of corruption is inadequate. Argentinians themselves speak of a dictatorship, which has stripped them of dignity and opportunity, both theirs and their families’. People work hard but they keep falling behind. They never have enough, working two or three jobs. I marvel at their energy and resourcefulness, which take a toll on their privacy — crammed into close quarters with extended family to economize — and their health — suffering bouts of extreme stress over money. The recent incident of minister of security Aníbal Fernández’s menacing tweet to political cartoonist Nic is evidence of the tyranny and also illustrates the impunity with which these officials operate, unapologetically threatening the children of dissidents, his masters in the Casa Rosada merely slapping his wrist for exposing their game. Moreover, the ability of the political parties, both those in and out of power, to project as energetically as they do a bright future is risible. It’s equally farcical how supposedly serious news outlets and pundits cover politics as if there were any other story than corruption and tyranny. Of course, the outlets are controlled by the very same parasitic individuals who control the government. Does an open political system still exist? I suppose if the elections are not fraudulent, an open political system can still be argued to exist, even if we were to overlook how votes are bought with bonos and other largesse. (Personally, I assume that fraud is endemic to elections here but has yet to be exposed. How could it not be with the sort of people who are in power?)