Kicillof Pays To 92% Of Bondholders, Griesa's Move Now?

[Rich One]

Judge Griesa will cheer for Argentina??

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=oavJ90KUMso#t=0

 

[dennisr]

Interesting player, David Martínez, settled bond holder: Fintech Advisory

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Mart%C3%ADnez_(businessman)

 

[Bajo_cero2]

The UN and OAS provide Argentina a rhetorical alternative, but they have no jurisdiction.

The same issue Griesa faces to enforce his desicion. Welcome to públic international law.

 

[ajoknoblauch]

The same issue Griesa faces to enforce his desicion. Welcome to públic international law.

Griesa made his decision on the basis of New York State contract law, which is what Argentina agreed to.

 

[Bajo_cero2]

Griesa made his decision on the basis of New York State contract law, which is what Argentina agreed to.

Sure, but he forgot that the contract was not between 2 persons.

The lawyers of the vulpures asked for disobey a Court desicion and i wonder whom they expect to jail ????????

The ABC of international públic law is the imposibility to enforce it.

 

[EdRooney]

You don't have to explain the unenforceability of laws to Americans. They wrote the book on it.

 

[ajoknoblauch]

Sure, but he forgot that the contract was not between 2 persons.

The lawyers of the vulpures asked for disobey a Court desicion and i wonder whom they expect to jail ????????

The ABC of international públic law is the imposibility to enforce it.

For purposes of contract law, Argentina is a person.

 

[Don Alberto]

Sure, but he forgot that the contract was not between 2 persons.

The lawyers of the vulpures asked for disobey a Court desicion and i wonder whom they expect to jail ????????

The ABC of international públic law is the imposibility to enforce it.

Sometimes I don't believe what I read.

If judge Griesa's ruling is impossible to enforce, why does Argentina
Whine in the OAS?
Whine before Mercosur?
Whine in the UN?
Send a negotiation team to New York?

Who can be jailed? the managers of any entity in the US which assists Argentina.

Less than a week ago Bank of New York Mellon Corp. dropped the Argentine deposit like a redhot brick - has that already been forgotten?

Anything - anything - owned by Argentina abroad not protected by the Wien (Vienna) Convention and a military convention is up for grabs. Any state which has commercial interests in the US will co-operate.

Remember the ARA Libertad frigata? although the ruling in the end protected it, it was detained by Ghana for some 2 months.
Imagine e.g. shipments of Argentine owned liquid natural gas being seized and withheld through August and September.

Let's not waste more time debating this, but instead wait and see what has happened in one month and one day.

 

[Don Alberto]

For purposes of contract law, Argentina is a person.

Precisely.

In contract law, Argentina is what is called 'a legal person', might as well have been Agustín, Graciela or Pablo.

 

[ajoknoblauch]

Precisely.

In contract law, Argentina is what is called 'a legal person', might as well have been Agustín, Graciela or Pablo.

Or Cristina or Axel, for that matter.