Los que más tienen

[Paige55]

So you're not using AI at all in these responses?

one of those was a response from me (top one you quoted), and I absolutely don't use A.I.

 

[mageesa]

one of those was a response from me (top one you quoted), and I absolutely don't use A.I.

Oh no I meant the other guy with the numbered lists. He seemed quite specific about the exact ways in which he *wasn't* using it...
I always appreciated the human-ness of this forum, but it may be no place is free of 'robot text'.

Not only for citizens, but specifically for native citizens that were not only born in Argentina but also both of their parents did

So you wouldn't want your own children to have access, if they were born here? Weird.

 

[SlowWalker]

So you're not using AI at all in these responses?

If I will use AI, I refer to it as a sentence or so "from Gemini" or "AI" just as others do.
I am absolutely a human being, not a bot. I have been to the cafe on Tuesdays before.
I write all my responses except for 2 which contained mostly response from Google.

I typically check up on Infobae every couple of days if not daily. Most of what is being discussed is just the same over and over again about protectionist policies, factories and production, the changing economy etc. If I know I have come across an article in the past about something I will google it and find either the article or similar on the subject.

In the 2 the contained mostly responses from Google AI, they were responding to JMHarris who in his posts has referenced Google AI. So since he has accepted it as a source I used it for 1 part of this (Audit Request for Universities to counter what he was claiming because when I just write it out he says no that is not it and dismisses it and just repeats his opinion), and the second was after I had already explained why I believed the Golden Age of Argentina was the period of time Pre-WW1 and was questioned by JMHarris "What history books are you reading???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? " , my response was a copy paste of Google AI and referred to it as such in the first line of the post since he has again accepted that as a source and ignores when I write something. Response to Textbook posts. Where I am there is no English, so this forum provides me a place to have higher level conversations/debates in English which I can't normally here. Automating AI responses would eliminate any joy I get from participating.

About the numbering, I think it tends to depend on the response. I previously used to just reply and put a huge list of number to respond to points individually. Frank instructed me how I can do the response with just short sections of the initial message, so I have started doing that instead of a huge reply at the bottom. In some messages however, the point is made by various sentences/paragraph together in which case it is harder to separate, so for those, I reply at the bottom. I think if there are a few points, I will put them in line as I did in the previous response, and it might also depend on the length of each. If its more of a list of short things like the digitization examples, I would put those in their own list. Using Word to write essays and reports, it was typically that the primary numbering was 1) or 1. , and then sub numbering would either be a), A), or i), and that is what has tended to become normal form me over the decades.

 

[xaxage]

So you wouldn't want your own children to have access, if they were born here? Weird.

Of course not. My children will have their own nation and a country. Being born in another country doesn't mean you belong to that nation. It's a pretty simple concept. As if i have children in China they are Chinese.

 

[FrankPintor]

Oh no I meant the other guy with the numbered lists. He seemed quite specific about the exact ways in which he *wasn't* using it...
I always appreciated the human-ness of this forum, but it may be no place is free of 'robot text'.

You need to make up your own mind, of course, based on what you see. If you're seeing huge hierarchical multilevel numbered lists produced in record time by someone who in other circumstances can't put a coherent sentence together... well, then you know. We all know.

Regardless of the protestations that the hierarchical multilevel numbered lists are the product of an orderly, tidy mind (that one was good for a giggle), I think it shows tremendous disrespect for those forum members who share actual experiences of living here, as well as their recommendations which can benefit the rest of us. Maybe no place is free of robot text, and I guess most of use use AI (Google basically shoves it in your face) to check facts, but still, filling the forum with AI slop ("flood the zone with shit"?) is only going to devalue the forum.

 

[JMHarris]

Maybe no place is free of robot text, and I guess most of use use AI (Google basically shoves it in your face) to check facts, but still, filling the forum with AI slop ("flood the zone with shit"?) is only going to devalue the forum.

Yes, flooding the zone is the expression I was trying to find! This is happening a lot on this forum.

Google AI definition of the phrase "flooding the zone" is as follows:

"Flooding the zone" is an authoritarian media strategy designed to overwhelm public attention by rapidly disseminating a high volume of conflicting information, scandals, and provocations. Rather than attempting to convince the audience of a specific truth, the goal is to create enough confusion and exhaustion that the public stops trying to distinguish fact from fiction, ultimately eroding the power of the media and institutional checks.