Alicia karr
Registered
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2010
- Messages
- 1,356
- Likes
- 1,519
They could save a lot if they didn't spend so much advertising directly to consumers in the states and New Zealand.
Right on!
I'm one of those few people who sometimes finds a well done commercial entertaining. But on my most recent visit to the states I was horrified at the number of pharma commercials there were. And after they're done (quickly, VERY quickly)stating all their potential side effects you realize you might die from just using the drug. Honestly, during the evening news hours, every other ad was for an erectile dysfunction, depression or pain relieving prescription medication. And that was on CNN. Heck sure need a lot of funds to research and develop those expensive commercials and pay for their air time. Probably spend MUCH more there than in their product R&D. I respect the need for product research and development funding, but suspect one ad costs more than five years salary for their top researcher....how come the same meds are and were so much cheaper here in Argentina, and without all the commercials?.....