I don't know "what is not correct"! Everything you say on this forum is "correct" only? Rest of us here are twiddling our thumbs sitting on our respective Pcs and don't know nothing about nothing?
Um, whoa. I'm sorry I can't refer you to anyone who could help with self-esteem issues or anger management.
I did not say anything about what you sit on or twiddle, and have no further comment in that regard.
The money quote from your earlier post was (emphasis added):
The "no questions cancellation" within 24 hours is done by Expedia, Orbitz, Cheap tickets and a1-2 more agents
and NOT by the airlines itself.
With the airlines, one has to purchase the highest price ticket and even then its kind of a gamble. With the agents, its never a gamble as long one returns it in 24 hours even if its the cheapest priced ticket.
That is in fact not true, as the links I posted make clear. I didn't say there's anything wrong with agents or anyone else, just that the airlines - specifically, United and Delta -
do cancel within 24 hours, and in fact are obligated to do so by the Department of Transportation. If you prefer Expedia, go for it.
One need not travel in a US airline or be a US immigrant or purchase a ticket out of USA or be any way connected to USA to do what I have referred to in my earlier post. And some of the agents offering this 24 hour refund are not connected to USA in any way.Some are registered in Uk or Isle of Man The world does not start and end with USA. Not everyone traveling to BA is coming from USA or going back from BA to USA.
Um, yeah. Whatever.
Exactly as I was the one who said this, in my post yesterday :-
The 24-hour window has nothing to do with the class of fare or type of ticket.
Actually, what you said about a ticket purchased from United/Delta is (emphasis added):
With the airlines, one has to purchase the highest price ticket and even then its kind of a gamble.
As the airlines themselves make clear, that is not true - a ticket purchased in any class can be cancelled within 24 hours for any reason.
I would not rely on any of the US airlines to reimburse me despite what they say as they use the word "may be eligible for refund". While the agents have a "no questions asked" policy. Recently, I purchased a ticket on United to go to the Houston from BA and wanted to cancel it within 5 minutes of buying it as I received a "change of plans" phone call. United said, its not eligible for the 24 hours refund policy for some jackass reason.
The 'may' refers to some basic T&C that apply, like using a credit card not cash. They are not complicated. Here are United's:
Terms and conditions
Applies to tickets booked at united.com or with the United Customer Contact Center.
The 24-hour timeframe begins at the time your ticket is purchased.
Requests for refunds will be credited back in the original form of payment, with the exception of purchases made with a United Gift Certificate, which will be credited back in the form of electronic travel certificates.
Group tickets and tickets purchased using Western Union, cash or e-certificates are excluded.
Reservations that are being held but have not yet been purchased are excluded.
Any FareLock[sup]SM[/sup] fees paid to hold a reservation will not be refunded.
I cannot speak to your experience but in general the airlines I mentioned are obligated to cancel within 24 hours, and at least in theory are liable to substantial penalties if they do not do so. An employee may have been out of line, it wouldn't be the first time. I've heard my share of horror stories regarding expedia travelocity and the like as well.
No immigration ever has a problem. Its always the airlines as they fear a fine and having to fly you back to your point of origin at their cost and hence all the hassles. The funny thing is that they seem to scrutinize the passport etc for authenticity much more than the immigration itself.
Nothing all that funny about it, even if Argentina is somewhat lax about enforcement (I'd rather doubt the word ever), most countries are not, and have strong leverage in the form of penalties to impose on the airlines. Are airlines supposed to keep a list of which countries' laws are to be taken seriously, and whose not? Their business is transporting people and not getting fined, so they've opted for a policy of 1) getting the countries' rules of who shouldn't be boarding, 2) enforcing them. Imagine that.
Lastly, this is not the first nor the second time that you get pretty worked up over absolutely innocuous comments of mine. I really have no bones to pick with you, you seem to lean towards descending to ad hominem comments, I'd suggest you keep a promise you made once - during a similarly silly spat - to ignore me.