Presidential Transition

EJ Larson, the only bad losets here are from Cambiemos.
I suppose you mean "bad losers" but no idea what you're talking about. Who said "bad losers?" I hope you're not referring to the post I made where I congratulated the k's for acknowledging and accepting their loss (i.e., they were good losers). English isn't your first language but you really should try to understand what you read before you criticize.
 
EJ Larson, the only bad losers here are from Cambiemos who, everytime they lose, they say there is fraud BUT later is evidenced that they just lost. (Del Sel and Cano).

Macri won the Presidency by a few votes. That's it.

He didn' t ein in the Congress, so, the opposition has power (a lot).
This is democracy.
Congress:
Do not know about that. Took a lot of political arm twisting by FpV to muster a quorum in the last session of Congress. These clowns are so dirty they will flip in heartbeat. Going to be interesting.
http://www.buenosairesherald.com/article/203875/victory-front-unity-breaks-down-in-congress


 
It is not fuzzy, it very clear, you just ignore something very obvious: you cannot become a President if you are procesado unless you brive too much. We'll see.

You can google what happend with Patti (he never become a congressman, even electod, he finished in jail).

You cannot become president if you're "condenado", not procesado.
 
Wrong, it was the chamber of appeals that nullified the decision of the judge you talk about.
http://www.lanacion.com.ar/1810384-la-camara-federal-rechazo-sobreseer-a-mauricio-macri-en-la-causa-por-las-escuchas-ilegales

I'm not sure what you're saying "wrong" to since I said that he's being kept procesado even though there's no evidence against him. The chamber upheld the decision of Casanello who said there's no evidence but it was too early to lift the procesamiento and new evidence or reevaluation of evidence might show Macri's involvement. Like I said "just because". A shot in the dark.

If anyone's interested, read Casanello's resolution here: http://www.cij.gov.ar/nota-13018-El-juez-Casanello-elev--a-juicio-oral-la-causa-por-las-escuchas-ilegales.html and the chamber upholding that resolution here: http://www.cij.gov.ar/nota-17060-Escuchas-ilegales--la-C-mara-confirm--el-rechazo-a-un-pedido-de-sobreseimiento-de-Mauricio-Macri.html

Understandably if people don't want to read 177 pages, here's a summary: http://www.lanacion.com.ar/1670353-la-justicia-sostiene-que-no-hay-pruebas-para-enviar-a-juicio-a-macri

Especially this part:

"Según Casanello, el cierre de la instrucción dispuesto por Norberto Oyarbide (el juez anterior de la causa) fue "prematuro" porque no hay una "prueba concreta" de que el jefe de gobierno porteño haya ordenado espiar a su cuñado, Néstor Leonardo, ni al dirigente opositor Sergio Burstein. Tampoco está demostrado en la causa -afirmó el juez- que Macri haya montado una "asociación ilícita" destinada al espionaje clandestino. Ésos habían sido los dos fundamentos centrales del procesamiento."
 
Because he has the right party - "innocent until proven guilty" apparently only applies to FpV members...
 
Rejpice Will never see Ministro DEvido and Tomada and Hopefully La Morsa Fernandez....!

AND 678 buffon's gone forever Rejoice no more Hebe de Bonafini...??

MAcri has 3 children never been shown, no free flights for Rio Gallegos...ª

hebe-de-bonafini-590x410.jpg
 
El Pensador, as usual, your nickname is too big for you.

Just like your corrupt queen you cannot debate or be accountable for things like the corruption of vote buying. You cannot even act like a man you do not even deserve a mans honor Bajo all you can do is offer childish insults like a little man with very little understanding. No wonder your a Kster... pathetic.
 
Back
Top