Sockhopper
Registered
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2008
- Messages
- 288
- Likes
- 183
MorganF said:why did so many people, *fully admitting in this thread that they knew he was so sketchy* (that he lied so much etc), why did they still befriend him, work for him, live with him? It's weirdly funny, all the people saying, "yeah, I knew he lied (or he stole or he did all these other bad things)... but I didn't think he was a bad guy... I was friends with him anyway (or I went to work for him or lived with him)... and then he stole from me, so now I hate him".
-morgan
Pass the popcorn, Morgan. Perhaps people allow themselves to fall for deceit and scams because the scammer is adept at keeping them occupied playing “the trust game”:
http://neuroeconomics.typepad.com/ne...ust_games.html
According to results of studies produced in 1995, only 5% of us don't feel a need to trust others including strangers.
Perhaps once a scammer is certain that someone is committed to playing that game out with him/her, all he then has to do is hope that some of his targets have too much of the neurotransmitter known as the “trust hormone”, Oxytocin (not Oxycontin) in their blood:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2011/aug/21/oxytocin-zak-neuroscience-trust-hormone
It’s said that environmental factors might help determine levels of this chemical in each of us.
Could it be that whether someone falls prey to a scam because he trusts too much or averts one by not trusting depends entirely or more upon his chemical makeup even though we tend to think of victims as ‘gullible’ and persons who avoid cons as ‘smart’?
Does saying that one “learned a lesson” as a result of being scammed synchronize with a rise in a person’s Oxytocin level after he sees the hard results of a successful scam against him? Or do some of us have to endure always trusting too much or not enough regardless of our intelligence and not wanting to be scammed?