Respect


nicolai.jpg


chavez-rally-04.jpg


bloombergchart_3217930a.jpg

-1x-1.png
 
Ben, the law of this country describe what you call as simple associations like illegal ones and it is a crime itself.

It is also a crime that he hide them at the affidavit.

You are confused, criminals are allowed to lie in this country. So, his explanations are what they are.

He asserted, also, that he knew about the 3rd offshore by the press. Right!

Sorry, difficult to believe.

Pd.: it was needed to kill a federal prosecutor to get Macri to Presidency, because the co prosecutor who accused Macri, suddenly ask for a non guilty sentence. Was he afraid of having a domestic accident with a bullet too?
 
Ben, the law of this country describe what you call as simple associations like illegal ones and it is a crime itself.

It is also a crime that he hide them at the affidavit.

You are confused, criminals are allowed to lie in this country. So, his explanations are what they are.

He asserted, also, that he knew about the 3rd offshore by the press. Right!

Sorry, difficult to believe.

Pd.: it was needed to kill a federal prosecutor to get Macri to Presidency, because the co prosecutor who accused Macri, suddenly ask for a non guilty sentence. Was he afraid of having a domestic accident with a bullet too?

Lol again trying to insinuate Macri killed Nisman.
 
Ben, the law of this country describe what you call as simple associations like illegal ones and it is a crime itself.

Are you saying that it's illegal and a crime to have contracted the services of a law firm that others have used for nefarious ends?
(Or to engage in a practice in which others have engaged for nefarious ends).
Really? Are you actually saying that?

It is also a crime that he hide them at the affidavit.

Are you stating, contrary to just about everyone, that a director of a company who:
  • holds no shares, and
  • receives no renumeration
in said company, is committing a crime by not stating them, particularly when said company was disclosed by the one who was actually supposed to?
Are you really saying that?

(Bonus shit-points for saying 'hide', when in fact the company was declared, just by the appropriate person).

You are confused, criminals are allowed to lie in this country. So, his explanations are what they are.

Are you really saying there will be no major reprecussions for Macri for publicly lying?
Really?

Pd.: it was needed to kill a federal prosecutor to get Macri to Presidency, because the co prosecutor who accused Macri, suddenly ask for a non guilty sentence. Was he afraid of having a domestic accident with a bullet too?

So now we're insinuating that Macri is sobreseido not on the merits, but by threats of violence.
Because that other case, was somehow attached to Macri.
It was Macri and his people who tried to frame it as a suicide.
It was Macri and his people who threatened - allegedly - the journalist who broke the story, and then - not allegedly but factually - tweeted out his flight details, an act as sinister and thuggish as it is illegal.
Again - really? Really?

=========

So there you the K playbook. A series not of statements which can be reasonably argued with, but just 'WTF?!' exaggerations, innuendoes and lies.

Stuff that leaves the honest casual observer, who isn't used to the sheer onslaught of crap, said in an authoritative and confident tone, stupefied. Surely it can't all be such utter and total nonsense! There must be at least something to it all...

Same as the Diario Registrado misrepresentations and forgeries (to the clear proof of which you've never responded, bajo), the idea of accuracy and responsible, reasonable debate is not important. Just throw as much shit as possible against the wall and see what sticks. And when caught - change the topic and hurl more.

This comes back to the premise of the thread. Respect is in many ways the antonym of 'cualquier cosa'.

Respect for the person you're debating precludes saying 'cualquier cosa' you have to filter out the shit yourself rather than forcing your opponent to do it.

(BTW - In a courtroom, the above is much less true - your goal is to win at (almost) any cost, basically by any means you can get away with are permitted by the rules of procedure. If your adversary can be overshouted by an avalanche of innuendo, counterattacks and whatnot (true? who cares?) you're actually doing your job.

But you are not in court bajo, and IRL there is a requirement to be reasonable, to respect the person you're debating by not insulting their intelligence - or not be taken seriously.)

Your last post shows clearly how poco seriously you ought to be taken. It's a shame because to have someone who you disagree with and can reasonably debate is a delight. But you're the wrong guy.
 
It was 12,319 people -- someone counted. For once the police got something right, they had estimated 12,000. The Ks claim it was 300,000 people!!!

There were 525 approx that waited for her at her house (Brancatelli claimed 10,000 at the airport and more at her house)

And when she danced her ridiculous dance it was more like 160 people -- apparently the woman who told the news "I had more people at my birthday party" when asked about how many were there for the dance show could well have been right.

http://www.lavoz.com.ar/politica/periodista-conto-los-militantes-k-en-el-acto-de-cristina
 
I may add that the lack of respect, in the case of K-landia, comes right from the top. Here's the lady herself, regarding the fallout from the Panama Papers:

which are suppressed in all of the media in the Republica Argentina... and which have already brought about the resignations of two prime ministers, in Ukraine and in Iceland, while here not a hair moves...

Is the good lady, a lawyer by trade, so ignorant as to not know the difference between the utterly innocuous stuff that's been found on Macri to date (director of a company, duly declared, defunct without having opened a bank account), and the absolutely big deal that the revelations concerned in Iceland (millions stashed away, huge claims on failed banks that he was in charge of restructuring)? Or that the Ukranian PM was already reviled as a symbol of systemic and endemic corruption well before the Panama Papers were ever a thing?

Yes, of course she knows. This is intended for consumption by people whose intelligence she does not respect.
 
The authorities are really generous to keep Brancatelli on the air.....They should apply the K tactics soon
 
It was 12,319 people -- someone counted. For once the police got something right, they had estimated 12,000. The Ks claim it was 300,000 people!!!

There were 525 approx that waited for her at her house (Brancatelli claimed 10,000 at the airport and more at her house)

And when she danced her ridiculous dance it was more like 160 people -- apparently the woman who told the news "I had more people at my birthday party" when asked about how many were there for the dance show could well have been right.

http://www.lavoz.com...cto-de-cristina

Shhh, that's not the script. Don't you know there were millions on the street and Macri has turned Cristina into the new Peron.
 
Back
Top