Ben, the law of this country describe what you call as simple associations like illegal ones and it is a crime itself.
Are you saying that it's illegal and a crime to have contracted the services of a law firm that others have used for nefarious ends?
(Or to engage in a practice in which others have engaged for nefarious ends).
Really? Are you actually saying that?
It is also a crime that he hide them at the affidavit.
Are you stating, contrary to just about everyone, that a director of a company who:
- holds no shares, and
- receives no renumeration
in said company, is committing a crime by not stating them, particularly when said company was disclosed by the one who was actually supposed to?
Are you really saying that?
(Bonus shit-points for saying 'hide', when in fact the company
was declared, just by the appropriate person).
You are confused, criminals are allowed to lie in this country. So, his explanations are what they are.
Are you really saying there will be no major reprecussions for Macri for publicly lying?
Really?
Pd.: it was needed to kill a federal prosecutor to get Macri to Presidency, because the co prosecutor who accused Macri, suddenly ask for a non guilty sentence. Was he afraid of having a domestic accident with a bullet too?
So now we're insinuating that Macri is sobreseido not on the merits, but by threats of violence.
Because that other case, was somehow attached to Macri.
It was Macri and his people who tried to frame it as a suicide.
It was Macri and his people who threatened - allegedly - the journalist who broke the story, and then - not allegedly but factually - tweeted out his flight details, an act as sinister and thuggish as it is illegal.
Again - really?
Really?
=========
So there you the K playbook. A series not of statements which can be reasonably argued with, but just 'WTF?!' exaggerations, innuendoes and lies.
Stuff that leaves the honest casual observer, who isn't used to the sheer onslaught of crap, said in an authoritative and confident tone, stupefied.
Surely it can't all be such utter and total nonsense! There must be at least something to it all...
Same as the Diario Registrado misrepresentations and forgeries (to the clear proof of which you've never responded, bajo), the idea of accuracy and responsible, reasonable debate is not important. Just throw as much shit as possible against the wall and see what sticks. And when caught - change the topic and hurl more.
This comes back to the premise of the thread. Respect is in many ways the antonym of 'cualquier cosa'.
Respect for the person you're debating precludes saying 'cualquier cosa' you have to filter out the shit yourself rather than forcing your opponent to do it.
(BTW - In a courtroom, the above is much less true - your goal is to win at (almost) any cost, basically by any means you
can get away with are permitted by the rules of procedure. If your adversary can be overshouted by an avalanche of innuendo, counterattacks and whatnot (true? who cares?) you're actually doing your job.
But you are not in court bajo, and IRL there is a requirement to be reasonable, to respect the person you're debating by not insulting their intelligence - or not be taken seriously.)
Your last post shows clearly how poco seriously you ought to be taken. It's a shame because to have someone who you disagree with and can reasonably debate is a delight. But you're the wrong guy.
