Dear forum members, let us stay calm, respect opinions and not accuse each other of being K, as apart from a old, grumpy former exile in France I have never met someone who showed unconditional support for this government...! A very weird thing, indeed. In many European countries there's often this strong and often unforgiving socialist- conservative divide but in Argentina people are pretty realistic with a mentality that implies that all politicians are thieves anyway - which happens in every country but it is just so obvious here, and I happen to like cynicism about politics, which is absent in the minds of many strongly polarized Europeans I have met.
Anyway. What I am seeing here on this last page is another argument that in my personal view would be way too unforgiving to Buenos Aires.
I am more conscious than ever of the negative sides of Buenos Aires and I would agree that it can be a bit repetitve place every now and then. But, please, when somebody starts favouring an extremely dull, superficial, children's museum-like, Disney city as Barcelona over Buenos Aires, I think you have just missed the essence of the capital of Argentina. I invite you to go and live in a place like Vienna. Beautiful museums, nice architecture too, more of a traditional European capital. After a while you will find out that in essence many of these European glorious capitals are all the same and rather boring and monotonous, without life, without a certain spice to it.
However, people who (not necessarily specifically someone in this thread, but more the general negative crowd I would imagine) forget about the beauty and attractiveness of the place, and just shout their desilusion all the time, please allow for a bit of sunlight in your life....
you describe the architectural and urban design sides of BA, and it's alll correct and proper. incl self exp<b></b>ression as graffitti with it's own value, mosaics etc. no arguments re beauty and possibly nuanced - or not- differences between neighboorhoods. This is purely an aesthetic approach, valid for art critisizm. Not for a living, breathing city. in my opinion, and with greatest respect.
NY, Barcelona, London, Boston, Avignon etc have exact same variety and stylistic complexity and beauty you appreciate. Out of American cities, i can think of NY, Providence, Boston, SanFran. which all have history dating back few hundred yrs. Rejkjavik - i don't recall when it was founded - is amazing in that respect, minus the different neighboorhoods. If you care to take the point further, actually, London would be a beautiful example as it was made up of a bunch of villages all joined together; to this day each village has it's own unique spirit, layout, mythology and 'attitude'. NYC , or rather Manhattan, has been founded as a single entity; however you have to be honest here - it's boroughs are just as different and varied as those of BA, perhaps more so. Eg people, architechture, 'worldview' of Chelsea, East village, Greenwich or west villages, flatiron, Upper east or west sides cannot be more different. furthermore, it's even reflected in clothing styles, sometimes professions, etc! and NYC has the greatest mix of architectural styles in my view. I will also argue that the 'porteno style' prevails in ALL neighboorhoods - be it cobblestone streets of San Telmo or 'wide boulevards' with jazz bars of Serrano sq or Caballito or Belgrano - so i speak of those i've seen - honestly, the spirit of the place changes very little in my view, it possibly depends on how romantically/sentimentally/artistically inclined one is. IE Mentality/behaviour/people are very similar . Which is not at all a negative view, more a view of cohesion.
And last point. I don't know if it's FAIR to compare BA with London, Paris, NYC. BA is a capital of a great country, with tremendous resources - people, thigns, intellectual etc. But the 'energy' people speak about - ok the agitation of big city, you have it in Moscow, Hong Kong, Beijing, Tokyo, Paris - that is different from 'vibe, ambiance, energy' which i personally experience in London and NYC. It has to do w my personal tastes - eg i do not consider having 43 boliches/bars/raves all playing commercial music as 'vibe" - but people get all orgazmic describing the partying here in BsAs. To me, it's just consumption, or clubbing. In London, there is a bunch of independent theater/music/art which is exhibited, lots of free things, lots of international dance/theatre/art . Huge numbers of free lunchtime classical concerts in historical venues throughtout town. Stand up comedy, shows etc. Same for fashion - it's outward oriented, living in a world. That worked as 'energy, vibe" for me. That is the energy which made so many good music bands there. IMHO. Same for Manhattan.
I don't know if comparison is fair at all fair. I love BsAs, it's eclectic, beautiful yet stern , it has tango which i love to dance, good people and lovely weather. I don't know how one compares, or if it is worth even posing the question. I am at a loss as to why not clean dog poop - because it's a reflection of your love and appreciation and respect for your city and your country. And i don't see same opportunities for that vibrant exposure to all kinds of wild cultural possibilities - and thus sharing of opinion and opennes and tolerance - which i've grown to love before. It's a different place. And we all love it for our own reasons.