PhilinBSAS
Registered
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2010
- Messages
- 580
- Likes
- 298
I was quoting lauren...don't shoot this messenger please...I've no teaching qualifications BUT I've taught at the University of Khartoum so IM a real teacher too..! h34r:
Well BANG
to whoever said it first and subsequently repeated that qualified and experienced TEFL teachers who have proper certificates are not "teachers"
I think it may be useful to examine all this a little more closely.
As you mentioned your time at the Uni of Khartoum (what an interesting place to have worked) I'll explain my background. For a part of my working life I've been a lecturer, a tutor at graduate and post grad levels and a degree course coordinator in a Uni in London and have academic as well as other professional qualifications but was rather circumspect at the time in calling myself a "teacher" having made the decision not to do PGCE after leaving Uni to do postgrad stuff. This was out of deference to those who actually learnt how to teach and could demonstrate this to a recognised standard by an objective measure i.e were professional teachers.
This gets to the heart of it. I think teaching is a professional occupation and I don't think that teaching can be adequately acquired and expounded without having been through a recognised course. It's that simple to me.
Subsequently and having put in the time, effort and resources - and it was very intensive - to do CELTA teaching theory and then teaching practice and worked up to DELTA entry level and carried on with CPD and done a further certificate course I have no compunction in saying I'm a teacher.
BTW In Europe CELTA is regarded as a basic teaching qualification - and you still need more to teach in a secondary school, ESOL in a tertiary college etc
Now I'm possibly going to upset others on here having sounded off myself but IMHO someone who has not some sort of basic professional accreditation or aspiration to learn and stay current in the profession of "teaching" and says they just "teach English" is better described as a "tutor" in the same way as I described myself as a lecturer. Just having a first language and a education to secondary/tertiary doesn't give you the skills to teach that language.
I know there are plenty of L1 people on here - and even those who dont have English as L1 maybe just L2 etc and who derive an income from "teaching english" and have no qualms about saying they are "teachers". Well fine 'cos that's how the rules (or lack of them) operate here. Doesn't change my opinion of teaching being a profession etc etc ad nauseum without I hope me sounding too "preachy"
We could go off and look for definitions of what is a teacher but having no professional accreditation or aspiration puts this in question in my mind. You can quote a number of examples of people in history who we would all recognise as being "teachers" even if they hadn't done a teaching course. Well that is history. Also there are a never ending growth in "near" professions - to quote fiction in Hitch Hikers Guide - Telephone Sanitisers - which are dubious and whose net worth to the planet can be argued. I've worked with unqualified teachers and have no problems with that - other than trying and in some cases successfully persuading them to do a proper course!
Of course the background to this is the effort to drive up professional standards at least in Europe and to stop people from being ripped off as well as other bad stuff. I went for a walk yesterday and spotted at least five "establishments" offering English language teaching. By whose judgement? Don't say "the Market"!!
Sorry to bang on with my more than ha'pence's worth. For anyone still retaining any interest really this could be a thread for debate on it's own