random said:Again, what about Mario Firmenich?
The fact that none of you has responded to that question suggests that none of you knows who he is, or what he did. Ever heard of Aramburu?
Yes, what about him? If you think he ought be retried for the murder or conspiracy to murder, or any other crimes, you're free to advocate that.
I fail to see what it has to do with prosecuting Videl et al. I'm sorry, but it's not in the same league.
random said:During that whole period (starting before the golpe del estado), Argentina was basically engaged in a civil war. It was HORRIBLE, period.
But it's over now. Let it go. Seeking vengeance after 30 years doesn't help Argentina with its many problems of TODAY.
It's not vengeance, it's justice. Justice for those who were murdered, tortured, had their identities and families stolen from them. It's simply not for you to say "let it go".
random said:The US right now is in a crisis state. Should the American people forget about the economy, the wars, the healthcare crisis, etc. and focus on prosecuting Cheny and Rumsfeld for human rights abuses? But that's not a good example because their crimes are still current --- flash forward 25 years years, imagine that the US has similar problems to those it has now, and then ask yourself whether the people (many of whom will have been born AFTER those two retired) should be focusing on solving the current problems or trying to get "justice" for the victims of waterboarding, etc.
I fail to see how the two interconnect. Prosecuting criminals has nothing to do with the operation of heathcare, the economy or whatever other bugbear you have.
Criminals are tried by judges in courts. That's their function. The judiciary isn't going to fix healthcare, the economy, export controls or whatever else you don't care for about the current government here or in the US. The two are unrelated, trying to tie them together is just cheap political opportunism.