"The EG.5 subvariant is already in Argentina, could COVID cases increase?"

Click anywhere on the articles in Spanish to open the menu. Next click on Translate to English.
12 September 2023
Increase in COVID cases in Argentina: who and where persons should be tested....
Is the latest version of the vaccine available in Buenos Aires ?
 
Is the latest version of the vaccine available in Buenos Aires ?
The answer is NO. As of today, the latest FDA approved Pfizer and Moderna messenger RNA
formulations against the new subvariants of the coronavirus are not available in Argentina.
 
the COVID 'vaccines' are:

1. experimental to create profit for corrupt BigPharma.
2. ineffective and are already outdated for the strains like the Flu shots are.
3. replete with crazy side effects that cause arthritis or even "Died Suddenly" heart issues/swelling/clots.
4. are claimed to be 'safe and effective' yet there are tons of studies that mRNA is extremely dangerous with no long-term studies on humans
don't get any more shots. COVID is literally just the Flu and no one gets seriously sick/dead except for people who are massively obese with 3+ co-morbidities or 80+ and super old/frail (who sadly will die anyway of something else routine). no one cares about the 'new COVID strain' except those who stare into the screen and wait for the next order from their tyrants. read Macanudo's twitter/X link!
 
the COVID 'vaccines' are:

1. experimental to create profit for corrupt BigPharma.
2. ineffective and are already outdated for the strains like the Flu shots are.
3. replete with crazy side effects that cause arthritis or even "Died Suddenly" heart issues/swelling/clots.
4. are claimed to be 'safe and effective' yet there are tons of studies that mRNA is extremely dangerous with no long-term studies on humans
don't get any more shots. COVID is literally just the Flu and no one gets seriously sick/dead except for people who are massively obese with 3+ co-morbidities or 80+ and super old/frail (who sadly will die anyway of something else routine). no one cares about the 'new COVID strain' except those who stare into the screen and wait for the next order from their tyrants. read Macanudo's twitter/X link!
Thank god someone is speaking the truth.

I had to get the two shots to be able to to travel and so deeply regret it. Still dealing with the side effects two years later.
 
This doctor (Peter A. McCullough) is qualified in cardiology and internal medicine, with no qualifications in any field related to virology. He's been sanctioned by the American Board of Internal Medicine, and sued by his former employer for spreading misinformation about COVID (and to to prevent him falsely claiming any current association with that employer). He advocated for hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, which have been shown to be useless, To be specific, none of his ideas have been supported by any randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trials, In other words, he's a quack.

He's pushing a long list of false, inaccurate, and misleading claims in support of (what else? :rolleyes: ) a libertarian agenda: https://toolbox.google.com/factcheck/explorer/search/"Peter McCullough";hl=en He has also not been invited to address the European Parliament (another false claim).

It's a pity that a useful and informative thread has been defaced with this crap.
 
....I had to get the two shots to be able to to travel and so deeply regret it. Still dealing with the side effects two years later.
What is your age group? What is the brand name(s) of the 2 shots that you got to be able to travel?
In which country did you get them? What side effects are you still dealing with after 2 years?
 
This doctor (Peter A. McCullough) is qualified in cardiology and internal medicine, with no qualifications in any field related to virology. He's been sanctioned by the American Board of Internal Medicine, and sued by his former employer for spreading misinformation about COVID (and to to prevent him falsely claiming any current association with that employer). He advocated for hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, which have been shown to be useless, To be specific, none of his ideas have been supported by any randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trials, In other words, he's a quack.

He's pushing a long list of false, inaccurate, and misleading claims in support of (what else? :rolleyes: ) a libertarian agenda: https://toolbox.google.com/factcheck/explorer/search/"Peter McCullough";hl=en He has also not been invited to address the European Parliament (another false claim).

It's a pity that a useful and informative thread has been defaced with this crap.
Ivermectin has most definitely not shown to be useless against COVID's worst outcomes.

Why anyone would believe the US FDA, CDC, Pfizer, Moderna, etc after the blatant criminal lies they peddled regarding the origins of COVID and the safety and efficacy of the MRNA "vaccines" is beyond my level of comprehension. These are totally corrupt organizations/ companies who strictly look out for their own interests and not those of the humans the took advantage of using lies and scare tactics.
 
Ivermectin has most definitely not shown to be useless against COVID's worst outcomes.

Why anyone would believe the US FDA, CDC, Pfizer, Moderna, etc after the blatant criminal lies they peddled regarding the origins of COVID and the safety and efficacy of the MRNA "vaccines" is beyond my level of comprehension. These are totally corrupt organizations/ companies who strictly look out for their own interests and not those of the humans the took advantage of using lies and scare tactics.
From the Economist, "Ivermectin may help covid-19 patients—but only those with worms". From a medical article: "In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled platform trial including 1206 US adults with COVID-19 during February 2022 to July 2022, the median time to sustained recovery was 11 days in the ivermectin group and 11 days in the placebo group. It has no effect.

And about hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine, from https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases...expert-answers/coronavirus-drugs/faq-20485627 "...data analysis showed that the drugs are not effective for treating COVID-19. They can also cause serious heart problems."

Here's something about the Mayo Clinic "quietly updating" its guidance regarding hydroxychloroquine, https://www.techarp.com/science/mayo-hydroxychloroquine-covid/ It was not a recent development, or even a quiet change. The last time Mayo Clinic appears to have changed its hydroxychloroquine article regarding COVID-19 was June 2020. First to notice, after only 3 years was Peter Navarro (who'd have thunk it? 🤣 ). Furthermore, "Using this medicine alone or with other medicines (eg, azithromycin) may increase your risk of heart rhythm problems (eg, QT prolongation, ventricular fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia). Hydroxychloroquine should only be used for COVID-19 in a hospital or during clinical trials". As in, don't do this at home, kids :)

The scientists who do this research, conduct proper double-blind trials, and publish peer-reviewed articles are not stupid. They already identified some inexpensive treatments that could be repurposed for treating COVID, like Dexamethasone. I'll take their proven research over any "I found this on Twitter" guff.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top