mini said:I had changed my mind. But, you're on it now.
That's because you missed me so much. I am sure you will change your mind again soon.
mini said:I had changed my mind. But, you're on it now.
mini said:It's distracting and extremely difficult to read. I said it was OT. You didn't have to answer if you wanted to stay on topic. I've also said everything I want to say on this topic. You haven't advanced the conversation very much.
Wait, you're the one who just told me that -I- should start adding to the conversation. My question is almost a month old. Why bring it up now? You reply brings nothing to this discussion either.redrum said:i didn't realize it was my job to advance the conversation. You've said everything you wanted to say on the topic? Please reread my original post. You have posted nothing related to my original post. You very seldom do.
Yes. I found all those ........... quite distracting. Your writing is now much clearer & easier to read. Thank you.if you find my writing style distracting and difficult to read then i suggest not reading/replying to my threads/posts. I, and I'm sure others, could do without your curt, sarcastic responses and nit picking that contribute very little except to distract from healthy debate.
i've tried to engage you in a friendly and diplomatic manner throughout all of our exchanges in the past. this isn't the first time however you've attempted to take cheap, subtle pot shots at me.
you insist on attacking the speaker and being unnecessarily critical over frivolous details rather than addressing the issues in a cordial, intelligent manner. you almost seem to relish in it. grow up my friend and stop being a child.
mini said:Wait, you're the one who just told me that -I- should start adding to the conversation. My question is almost a month old. Why bring it up now? You reply brings nothing to this discussion either.
Yes. I found all those ........... quite distracting. Your writing is now much clearer & easier to read. Thank you.
BTW, you can't really think you are going to get a "health debate", do you? The subject of this thread is "The United States of SHAME". It's insulting and inflammatory. It's just like me starting a thread that said "Argentina: A big pile of DogShit". How do you thing people will react? If you want to have a serious discussion. I'd be happy to do that. But I hope you won't start the discussion topic with an insult.
It's like me saying to someone, "you're a complete jackass. Wanna have dinner with me?"
You're being a bit melodramatic. You are the one who started this thread with an insult. But having said that you are reading too much into what I wrote. I asked a question. You answered it. That's all.
redrum said:Ok just for the record, i did not start the original thread. i merely reopened the original thread with the same title. original thread is here: http://baexpats.org/world-politics/7003-united-states-shame.html so if you want to complain about insulting/inflammatory titles then yell at jedard, not me.
Again, if you had actually read my original post you would have known this.
Moreover, you continue yet again to focus on insignificant details. who cares about the title...it's about the content contained in thread....to say that an inflammatory title does not provoke debate.....it's more likely just the opposite. Jedard's thread had 3 pages....mine so far has 8 so I hardly think ppl are not posting because they are turned off by the title. It sure didn't deter you from posting.
Why don't you let the moderators decide what is insulting/inflammatory. They seem to be doing a good job so far.
Carolina Girl said:In Argentina, you have to understand that it is a country that blew it considering their resources and well educated population (due to free k-college). at one time they borrowed from overseas like a college student with their first credit card, never thinking that they had to pay it back...they renigged(sic?) and often were overdue with world bank payments.
we. the usa, have not blown it yet... we came close in 2008 but somehow we scraped by and are on our way to some sort of solvency thanks to the chinese...
Carolina Girl said:actually argentina reminds me a bit of what buffalo, new york has been through. it seems like buffalo will never get it right. even cleveland and pittsburgh had renaisances but buffalo will be the last city to do so.
imes and the atlanta journal are great papers with all sorts of real news.
redrum said:.
also, Citygirl, to be fair. you say you lost some friends during the 9/11 attacks. well, a person didn't have to be there to have an opinion on what really happened. we all lost something that day, whether we were there or not. you being there does NOT make you an authority on what happened nor does it mean that you hurt anymore than any other human being.
the official story to 9/11 is a lie.
and that is NOT an insult. rather it IS an insult to swallow that a man in a cave on kidney dialysis orchestrated the attacks and is still on the loose after 8 years.
funny how bin laden is not even on the fbi's most wanted list...why you ask? because there is NOT enough evidence to link him to the crime. yet, if you ask any layman on the street they will tell you that bin laden was responsible.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7E3oIbO0AWE
citygirl said:Don't often check these but
1) I have never claimed to be an expert on 9/11. What I said was hearing people tell me they know EXACTLY what happened (when they were not there) strikes me as ridiculous and insensitive.
citygirl said:and
2) Wrong on the Bin Laden thing: http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/laden.htm
As for the rest, carry on.