Perhaps someone who understands immigration policy better than I can enlighten me. According to that article, Argentina is intaking about the same number of immigrants per year as Canada, a country with a slightly smaller population (about 5 million less). One assumes that these are legal immigrants only. Canada has fairly few illegal immigrants, Argentina likely has many more. Canada is #11 on the UN HDI; Argentina is #45.
Canada has a selective immigration policy geared to educated professionals, skilled workers and family reunification of the former. Our big problem is too many people with degrees who can't get jobs because their credentials aren't recognized or they have poor English/French skills. Unless I'm mistaken, the immigrants coming to Argentina from Paraguay/Bolivia/Peru are overwhelmingly impoverished, with little education and few formal skills - among the poorer segments of society in their home countries. Access to social benefits in Canada is very limited for non-residents (citizens or landed immigrants), neither of which status is simple to get. It is my understanding that social benefit access in Argentina is comparatively easy.
With the villa miserias growing every year and populated (predominantly) by immigrants - is there anything I'm missing other than more poor = more K voters? (Granting all the while that some amount of unskilled labour is in demand for menial construction, domestic work, etc.) On the face of it, this seems like a major drain on gov't expenditure - I know that a larger population inevitably creates a demand for more jobs, but this can't be doing anything to rebalance the skills deficit.
But here I am trying to make sense (or sense of) ...