Bajo_cero2
Registered
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2010
- Messages
- 7,949
- Likes
- 4,389
Elqueso, you are confused.
a) Bonadio was fined by the Consejo de la Magistratura because he was extorting the former administration moving the Hotesur case only when the case against him was moved at the Consejo de la Magistratura. The Consejo de la Magistratura is an extra power organization different than the judicial power you are mentioned wrongly. The Consejo de la Magistratura judge judges and the members belong to the university, the congress and the Court.
So. the former administration had mayority at the Consejo de la Magistratura. Not now.
You assert she has power at Court but facts show you are wrong. The Supreme Court cancel the fine to Bonadio very fast.
B) If a President decide to work or not with other forces this is the President's call. You critized Maier before. Zafaronni proposed him as his replacement but the former President didn't take him into consideration because he is radical, a gorila. But this is the Precident legit decision.
c) You assert that she went too far. however, the President is going further because he tried to appoint judges in comision, to dismiss the General Prosecutor, to dismiss Sabatella, to abolish the communication's law by decree, etc. Even Stolbitzer asserted that not even her went that far.
d) There wasn't political persecution neither censorship. Now Pagina12 is continiuosly hacked.
During the former administration Dr. Papavero was appointed as a federal judge even he is ultra opposition, in fact, he is related to the former dictatorship and the CELS asserted that he was a nazi. But this is the way republican and democratic institutions works, judges are appointed no matter whom they vote and "even" they are not officialist.
Here the situationes is more serious because Macri made his campaign based on to make institutions stronger while now he tries to destroy them.
If you remember the jueces subrogantes law (replacement judges), the former administration didn't appoint all the prospects. They assign the vacancies to every party according to the votes they got. So, they appoint 53% of the judges and the other judges were appointed by the opposition. This sounds a lot more democratic, don't you think so?
e) It is the President's call to honor or not the contracts you mention, I guess you talk about the vultures founds. You can agree or not, but it is just legal use of power. The new President decided to honor the contracts you mentioned and that's ok even I disagree because he ws voted for that.
f) I agree with many of the political decisions made by the former President and I disagree with many of the decision made by the President.
However, this is not the point.
I critize the President because he is attacking the institutions of the Republic and, if he success, them we are going to be living in a dictatorship. The Perfil Newspaper, instead, use the word kingdom.
g) I respect your opinion about Macri's policies: to increase the cost of energy, to take loans to open the cepo, to pay the vultures, etc. This is the what he was voted for, I cannot be against it.
But a different matter is his decision about to attacking the republican and democratic institutions. He cannot abolish a law with a decree. He cannot appoint SC judges by DNU, he cannot dismiss the general prosecutor by decree, etc. Because this is what define his administration as a dictatorship.
h) I have many critics to the former administration but I had never room here to express them because you (plural) were not critizicing, you were insulting, what I call to vomit hate: KK, Kukarachas, The Queen, The Regime, and so on.
i) You (plural) are behaving as blind clappers because there are very serious things going on and you embrace the happiness of this dictatorship no questions ask.
Sometime ago someone here asserted that he was going to run away because this was a diktatorship. I wander where is he now that we are going straight to a real dictatorship, unless he is stopped.
