Napoleon
Registered
- Joined
- May 5, 2008
- Messages
- 3,156
- Likes
- 1,550
KarlaBA said:I agree. The root problem of all this confusion is that the 'United States of America' is a very bad name for a nation.
What?
When the US, became a nation, it was the ONLY nation in America.
There was one independent country, The United States of America, and then a whole bunch of colonies under European flags.
One
Uno
There was no more fitting name.
Everyone else was Spanish, Portuguese, French, British, or under their rule.
ONE INDEPENDENT COUNTRY among a host of slaves & subjects of European Empires. (Of course the Navajo, the Mohawk, the Utes, the Commanche.... they would argue differently and they would have excellent points.) But as far as Nations With A Written Constitution... there was ONLY ONE!
And in the years that followed, every group of people in the Western Hemisphere would look to that one nation for guidance and would hold them up as an example. That country was the American dream. That country was America.
...some things have changed, but that's the way it was from the time of ~1776/1783 onward.
Again, and excellent name.
I like the name "Argentina" as well... of course it's an absolute misnomer and thinking of its origins (the Land of Silver) brings a laugh when you realize that the natural resources of Argentina are NOTHING like what was found in the temples and on the statues of Peru... pero bueno. Ni importa.