marksoc said:Take into account that Cachanovsky is not a good source for opinion. He is the guy that said that the dollar would cost today something like 10 pesos. Nobody takes him seriously because he uses data to make false claims, in this note if I read right, he is saying that K saids something because the INDEC claims something. Yes, the INDEC cooked the books to pay less for some debt. And the world did not collapsed (as it did when American banks did it).
In the first place, the dollar might well have risen to ten pesos if the Ks had not confiscated everything in sight to keep propping up the currency. A high dollar is a sure "piantavotos" - vote vanquisher.
Second, far from being discredited, Cachanovsky is much respected in economic circles.
Third, Cachanovsky simply quoted something Cristina Kirchner said. He has no need to make up anything - her self-serving statements are enough to make hilarious copy.
And fourth, the INDEC was corrupted and gutted by the Kirchners - it simply churns out whatever figures the government tells it to churn out.
Do you honestly think she's a good president? Or are you just having fun? Frankly, I find it hard to believe that anyone can be so credulous.