Often times they roast the beans with sugar or sugar substitutes. Seeing I don't add sugar or want sugar, it's a taste problem. Obviously there are places were that's not done.
Interesting article: I didn't know the history before. Given that wartime conditions no longer exist and German ersatz coffee and the like are now things of the past, these days if people drink cafe torrado con azucar it is probably because they prefer it that way. As far as I'm aware the main brands that offer such caramelised coffee also offer regular ground and roast products too so the choice not to drink it is there. If one's local supermarket doesn't stock the regular version it probably means most of ones neighbours prefer it the other way.Precisely. The so-called torrefacto. Basically ruins the coffee beans. Here's a nice article explaining this post-war toasting process which many places still employ.
...German ersatz coffee and the like are now things of the past...
It's a matter of personal choice in the same way that some people in the United States buy a perfectly good cup of coffee and then put a shot of vanilla into it. (Mind you, if people buy their coffee in an American gas station, the addition of the vanilla is completely understandable.)
... these days if people drink cafe torrado con azucar it is probably because they prefer it that way....
Excellent link, thanks. Up to 20% sugar in the bean, wow! Vanilla is a big word. I'd love to know the makeup of that additive in most places. On second thought maybe I wouldn't.Interesting article: I didn't know the history before. Given that wartime conditions no longer exist and German ersatz coffee and the like are now things of the past, these days if people drink cafe torrado con azucar it is probably because they prefer it that way. As far as I'm aware the main brands that offer such caramelised coffee also offer regular ground and roast products too so the choice not to drink it is there. If one's local supermarket doesn't stock the regular version it probably means most of ones neighbours prefer it the other way.
It's a matter of personal choice in the same way that some people in the United States buy a perfectly good cup of coffee and then put a shot of vanilla into it. (Mind you, if people buy their coffee in an American gas station, the addition of the vanilla is completely understandable.)
Starbucks is perfectly fine and much better than the average cafe, especially in terms of customer service. There's a reason Starbucks have long lines.
I don't quite understand people's fascination with Starbucks. I think it is rather an emotional attachment that doesn't have any rational basis behind it.
If you need to decide between Starbucks and a gas station, Starbucks undoubtedly wins. But in comparison with the local coffee chains? Let's take Martinez, for example. What would be a Starbucks' equivalent of a regular black coffee in Martinez? An Americano in a paper cup? Please explain me, in what way is it better?