"Fishface" said:
...That's where the complex comes from. And which Murdoch's tabloids play on, day after day. but what is the complex? what do Murdoch's tabloids play on?
In different ways, and probably more under Tory governments than Labour, as Tories typically play the jingoistic card more than Labour (the last refuge of a scoundrel is patriotism). For quite a while Tory ministers used to bray about how Britain was punching above its weight in the international arena -- this was an acknowledgment that nations such as Japan and Germany had surpassed it economically but that Britain's political influence was still greater -- primarily because of its "special relationship" with the USA. Nostalgia ranks high in the UK, looking back to a golden period which, as John Major once pointed out with irritation, never existed.
With powers that really matter, Britain backs down. Thus for example Hong Kong proper was ceded in perpetuity by the Chinese (unlike the New Territories, whose lease expired in 1997). But the Chinese wanted Hong Kong back and threatened to turn off the water and so the Thatcher government backed down without a whimper. Where was the jingosim then? And Hong Kong is thousands of times more valuable than a piece of rock in the South Pacific. But if an uppity second-tier country like Argentina tries to take away the Falklands, out comes all the jingoistic fervour and "Rule Brittania." Without this psychological complex, Britain would have ceded the Falklands a long time ago and resettled the sheep famers on the Isle of Wight.
I haven't lived in England now for almost twelve years but when I was there I used to watch talking heads on television agonising on what Britain's role in the world should be. Paul Kennedy in this connection once asked, "Do we wonder about what Portugal's role should be." Well, errr, ..., no, but Britain used to be a great power at one time, and it is still a special country. Well, so was Portugal. So was Spain. They've adjusted themselves to reduced stations. Why can't the Brits? Methinks part of the reason is that Britain "won" WW2.
In Thatcher's time, one idea was that Britain was a sort of fulcrum between the USA and the USSR, a sort of mediator, whose diplomatic skills could come in handy.
I like reading the novels of John le Carre, who does a masterful job -- in novels such as "The Night Manager," The Tailor of Panama," and "Absolute Friends" -- of revealing British pretensions. I particularly recommend the second one.
Truth to tell, I am an anglophile myself and the more so since I'm not English at all. I worry about Britain's role in the world. I think Britain is a special place (but one I can no longer afford to live in).