Apparently there are quite a few Putin fanboys here. Maybe not so many in Russia, though https://www.politico.eu/article/second-mobilization-russia-men-vladimir-putin-ukraine-war/
Zelensky Is Working on Joint Weapons Production with Argentina
- Thread starter MilHojas
- Start date
- Status
Apparently there are quite a few Putin fanboys here. Maybe not so many in Russia, though https://www.politico.eu/artiIvan Katchanovski is a falsifier of the Maidan massacre and contemporary history of Ukraine
Ivan Katchanovski is a falsifier of the Maidan massacre and contemporary history of Ukraine Ivan Katchanovski produced the pseudo-scientific paper named "The “Snipers’ Massacre” on the Maidan in Ukraine" which is based on the deliberate falsifications of the Maidan events. Everyone who closely...ivan-katchanovski.blogspot.com
Switzerland has it's own skeletons in the closet ... how about a Canadian approach ? .... larger country with abundant assets ... no, I'm not Canadian, but I have (mostly) respected and admired their approach, and results.
Canada has always stood ready to fight along their allies.
Canada has blood on it's hands too, it makes and exports military equipment for Saudi Arabia (it's 2nd largest export market, you know, that bastion of freedom and democracy) plus it's mining companies are second perhaps only to Australia's in terms of poisoning and killing indigenous communities across the globe. Plus there's their political support for Israel, the list goes on...
But I digress; I don't think anyone here likes Putin (at least I hope not), he's a crypto fascist dictator, maybe some of the far right members like him for his social conservatism/nationalism, but speaking for myself, I understand where he and the Russian Federation is coming from because I have at least a passing awareness of modern Russian post-soviet history. Now, this doesn't mean I support the war, or think the invasion was justified (let alone smart), but there is, from the Russian POV, a logic to why they've pursued this strategy, and the propaganda from the EU, State Department, and general English speaking internet users isn't helping, things like calling Russians ethnic slurs, laughing at the terrorist attack at the Kremenchuk mall, celebrating deaths from the Ural River flooding saying it's an act of god, etc.
When the Soviet Union collapsed, the West totally botched a chance to fold it in to the bigger European project; instead of treating Russia and Russians with respect, it kicked them when they were already down, and the EU and US sought to loot the country's wealth indirectly via privatization while simultaneously extracting huge geopolitical concessions from Russia, such as it signing on to the reunification of Germany, and the EU's eastward expansion. What did Russia want in return? Help with economic stabilization as it transitioned to a market economy (but that was limited, neoliberal in nature, and punitive for the overwhelming majority of Russian citizens), a relationship of equals prioritizing mutual diplomatic benefit ("Sure" they'd say, but not a chance that would happen in reality), and an understanding that if/when the EU expanded, it didn't include NATO (James Baker lied through his teeth on that one). Instead of these things, the West got a man they could work with in Boris Yeltsin, a drunk, who was told to sit down and shut up while the West dictated the terms of the 21st Century in Eurasia until Putin's election, and regular Russians saw a decline in standards of living, life expectancy, income, etc. but hey, you could go to McDonald's in Red Square and get Pepsi at the grocery store now.
Still, even knowing what kind of man Putin was from his work as a KGB Agent before the Soviet Union's collapse, and his work after it (anyone saying he was an enigma prior to 1999 is full of shit, Putin was a member of Yeltsin's cabinet, Director of the FSB, Prime Minister, and held numerous other posts, he wasn't an unknown quantity) and his war crimes during the Second Chechen War (and the bombing of Grozny in particular) the West originally was optimistic that Putin was just going to be a sober Yeltsin that would respond "How high?" when told to jump by DC and Brussels. That didn't turnout to be the case, and I'm convinced that the repeated talking down to, treating with contempt and disrespect, and even slights like Western leaders downplaying Russia's role in saving the world from Nazism further radicalized a man who was clearly a Russian nationalist.
All this occurs in parallel to the EU, and NATO expanding further East, and 1999 and 2004 in particular being key years. With the former, NATO was now on the Union State of Russia and Belarus' border via Poland, and in the later, Russia itself via Estonia and Latvia. While it's each state's prerogative to enter alliances as they see fit, I know the US Government and many Americans would absolutely lose their minds if Mexico entered a military alliance with China, and PLA battalions started rotating in and out of Northern Mexico. This experience further radicalizes Putin, Russia, and Russians, I would argue rightfully so, even if Poland, Estonia, and Latvia haven't directly threatened Russia's sovereignty. Oh, and on trop of this, all hell breaks lose next door in Ukraine when it goes through a Color (Orange) Revolution the same year which is coincidentally against Russia's preferred presidential candidate (yes, Viktor Yanukovych was insanely corrupt).
Now, fast forward 10 years, and ANOTHER Color Revolution happens again next door in Ukraine, and while having populist overtones about being anticorruption, a large component is about whether Ukraine's future lay with Brussels or Moscow, again something Ukrainians deserve to decide. Now, while the Orange Revolution was accused of being spooked up, which it likely was to the same extent any protest involving Western interests is, the Maidan Revolution was fully backed by the US and EU given the protest's stated goals (EU Association Agreement and Free Trade Agreement/leaving the Eurasian Customs Union in particular) yet people like to act as if it was just the Russians backing Yanukovych and the Party of Regions while DC and Brussels stood by and watched on the sidelines, but the facts to come out since, such as Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland's leaked call (I assume by the Russians) in which she says "Fuck the EU" shows that the State Department/NED/every other 3 letter agency desired a more active role for the West in shaping Ukraine post revolution.
All this is to say this is how the stage was set so that 8 years later a full scale Russian invasion came underway. Now, as I said previously, not only do I not support the invasion, I think it a strategic failure because it played directly in the US and EU's hands while simultaneously weakening the arguments (justly made I believe) by Russia that NATO/The West has been an aggressor since the fall of the Soviet Union, and a legitimate threat to Russia's national security. For those that feel this to not be the case, I ask you this: imagine if Canada had a revolution, and it decided to leave NATO, and began talking to China about a security agreement? A bunch of Chinese front groups then started operating in Canada, pushing for better relations and closer ties with China, and this include a military alliance with China that would see PLA battalions on both of the US' land border, and should Canada join the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, Chinese military bases near Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver, Calgary, etc. Would the US and Americans be right to feel threatened? Would you understand why some might wish to invade, even if you wouldn't support such a war? Would you also understand that it's Canadian's rights to decide their future, but such decisions come with consequences, even if you disagree with such consequences?
The idea that this is a simple conflict and any person with a brain should be shouting "Slava Ukraine" (might want to check the contemporary history on that saying, especially if you're Jewish or another minority) is a reductionist attempt to minimize how exactly the world got to this point. I lay no blame at the feet of Ukrainian civilians, especially the young men being forced by the Ukrainian state to be cannon fodder (including this 14 year old they tried to kidnap in April) nor do I blame young Russian men on the other side who face the same scenario, including prisoners being told they can either serve or be shot, I do however blame the West, and Zelenskyy for refusing to accept reality, that short of a direct NATO occupation of Ukraine, or transfer of tactical nukes, there is no positive outcome for Ukraine save for peace, as this is the map of Ukraine 2 years after the invasion:
But I digress; I don't think anyone here likes Putin (at least I hope not), he's a crypto fascist dictator, maybe some of the far right members like him for his social conservatism/nationalism, but speaking for myself, I understand where he and the Russian Federation is coming from because I have at least a passing awareness of modern Russian post-soviet history. Now, this doesn't mean I support the war, or think the invasion was justified (let alone smart), but there is, from the Russian POV, a logic to why they've pursued this strategy, and the propaganda from the EU, State Department, and general English speaking internet users isn't helping, things like calling Russians ethnic slurs, laughing at the terrorist attack at the Kremenchuk mall, celebrating deaths from the Ural River flooding saying it's an act of god, etc.
When the Soviet Union collapsed, the West totally botched a chance to fold it in to the bigger European project; instead of treating Russia and Russians with respect, it kicked them when they were already down, and the EU and US sought to loot the country's wealth indirectly via privatization while simultaneously extracting huge geopolitical concessions from Russia, such as it signing on to the reunification of Germany, and the EU's eastward expansion. What did Russia want in return? Help with economic stabilization as it transitioned to a market economy (but that was limited, neoliberal in nature, and punitive for the overwhelming majority of Russian citizens), a relationship of equals prioritizing mutual diplomatic benefit ("Sure" they'd say, but not a chance that would happen in reality), and an understanding that if/when the EU expanded, it didn't include NATO (James Baker lied through his teeth on that one). Instead of these things, the West got a man they could work with in Boris Yeltsin, a drunk, who was told to sit down and shut up while the West dictated the terms of the 21st Century in Eurasia until Putin's election, and regular Russians saw a decline in standards of living, life expectancy, income, etc. but hey, you could go to McDonald's in Red Square and get Pepsi at the grocery store now.
Still, even knowing what kind of man Putin was from his work as a KGB Agent before the Soviet Union's collapse, and his work after it (anyone saying he was an enigma prior to 1999 is full of shit, Putin was a member of Yeltsin's cabinet, Director of the FSB, Prime Minister, and held numerous other posts, he wasn't an unknown quantity) and his war crimes during the Second Chechen War (and the bombing of Grozny in particular) the West originally was optimistic that Putin was just going to be a sober Yeltsin that would respond "How high?" when told to jump by DC and Brussels. That didn't turnout to be the case, and I'm convinced that the repeated talking down to, treating with contempt and disrespect, and even slights like Western leaders downplaying Russia's role in saving the world from Nazism further radicalized a man who was clearly a Russian nationalist.
All this occurs in parallel to the EU, and NATO expanding further East, and 1999 and 2004 in particular being key years. With the former, NATO was now on the Union State of Russia and Belarus' border via Poland, and in the later, Russia itself via Estonia and Latvia. While it's each state's prerogative to enter alliances as they see fit, I know the US Government and many Americans would absolutely lose their minds if Mexico entered a military alliance with China, and PLA battalions started rotating in and out of Northern Mexico. This experience further radicalizes Putin, Russia, and Russians, I would argue rightfully so, even if Poland, Estonia, and Latvia haven't directly threatened Russia's sovereignty. Oh, and on trop of this, all hell breaks lose next door in Ukraine when it goes through a Color (Orange) Revolution the same year which is coincidentally against Russia's preferred presidential candidate (yes, Viktor Yanukovych was insanely corrupt).
Now, fast forward 10 years, and ANOTHER Color Revolution happens again next door in Ukraine, and while having populist overtones about being anticorruption, a large component is about whether Ukraine's future lay with Brussels or Moscow, again something Ukrainians deserve to decide. Now, while the Orange Revolution was accused of being spooked up, which it likely was to the same extent any protest involving Western interests is, the Maidan Revolution was fully backed by the US and EU given the protest's stated goals (EU Association Agreement and Free Trade Agreement/leaving the Eurasian Customs Union in particular) yet people like to act as if it was just the Russians backing Yanukovych and the Party of Regions while DC and Brussels stood by and watched on the sidelines, but the facts to come out since, such as Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland's leaked call (I assume by the Russians) in which she says "Fuck the EU" shows that the State Department/NED/every other 3 letter agency desired a more active role for the West in shaping Ukraine post revolution.
All this is to say this is how the stage was set so that 8 years later a full scale Russian invasion came underway. Now, as I said previously, not only do I not support the invasion, I think it a strategic failure because it played directly in the US and EU's hands while simultaneously weakening the arguments (justly made I believe) by Russia that NATO/The West has been an aggressor since the fall of the Soviet Union, and a legitimate threat to Russia's national security. For those that feel this to not be the case, I ask you this: imagine if Canada had a revolution, and it decided to leave NATO, and began talking to China about a security agreement? A bunch of Chinese front groups then started operating in Canada, pushing for better relations and closer ties with China, and this include a military alliance with China that would see PLA battalions on both of the US' land border, and should Canada join the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, Chinese military bases near Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver, Calgary, etc. Would the US and Americans be right to feel threatened? Would you understand why some might wish to invade, even if you wouldn't support such a war? Would you also understand that it's Canadian's rights to decide their future, but such decisions come with consequences, even if you disagree with such consequences?
The idea that this is a simple conflict and any person with a brain should be shouting "Slava Ukraine" (might want to check the contemporary history on that saying, especially if you're Jewish or another minority) is a reductionist attempt to minimize how exactly the world got to this point. I lay no blame at the feet of Ukrainian civilians, especially the young men being forced by the Ukrainian state to be cannon fodder (including this 14 year old they tried to kidnap in April) nor do I blame young Russian men on the other side who face the same scenario, including prisoners being told they can either serve or be shot, I do however blame the West, and Zelenskyy for refusing to accept reality, that short of a direct NATO occupation of Ukraine, or transfer of tactical nukes, there is no positive outcome for Ukraine save for peace, as this is the map of Ukraine 2 years after the invasion:
Macanudo
Registered
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2009
- Messages
- 716
- Likes
- 562
What 10 Years of U.S. Meddling in Ukraine Have Wrought (Spoiler Alert: Not Democracy)
By Aaron Maté, RealClearInvestigationsApril 30, 2024 In successfully lobbying Congress for an additional $61 billion in Ukraine war funding, an effort that ended this month with celebratory Dem
When Democrats targeted Trump for his phone call with Zelensky, the rookie Ukrainian leader was just months into a mandate that he had won on a pledge to end the Donbas war. In his inaugural address, Zelensky promised that he was “not afraid to lose my own popularity, my ratings,” and even “my own position – as long as peace arrives.”
In their lone face-to-face meeting, held on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly, Trump tried to encourage Zelensky to negotiate with Russia. “I really hope that you and President Putin can get together and solve your problem,” Trump said, referring to the Donbas war. “That would be a tremendous achievement."
But Ukraine’s powerful ultra-nationalists had other plans. Right Sector co-founder Dmytro Yarosh, commander of the Ukrainian Volunteer Army, responded: “No, he [Zelensky] would lose his life. He will hang on some tree on Khreshchatyk [Kyiv’s main street] – if he betrays Ukraine” by making a peace with the Russian-backed rebels.
No one in this thread is saying this is a simple conflict. And going all flood mode on explaining Putin’s behaviour isn’t making Russia look any better for invading a sovereign country.
There’s also a lot to be said about statements which are straight out of Russia’s most worn out propaganda. It is at best very debatable whether ‘the west botched a chance to incorporate the former Soviet Union into the fold of the European project.’ But that it was lack of respect or kicking a country when it’s down?’ Seriously? Talk about bias and simplification of a conflict! As if after decades of Cold War and the sudden collapse of the USSR, any responsible ‘western’ leader -let alone Europeans- would have suddenly been BFF with Russia let alone allow them into all things nato and defense. Russia knew full well back then it wasn’t going to happen.
But people have been extremely reductionist on the conflict, everyone from people in this thread to our jetsetting president. And if you read what I had said, you'd see that I agree with you, this was a strategic blunder (besides it being immoral and illegal) as it played directly in to the west's narrative about Russia being an evil aggressor.
There was absolutely a world in which the Russian Federation could have ended up in the EU and NATO, but that wasn't the objective of the Bushes, Clintons, Brent Scowcrofts, and Kissinger alumni of the world, these people don't actually believe in a rules based liberal international order (look at Israel if you think they do), they wanted to create a unipolar world with the United States as the sole superpower, and they were so sure of themselves that Fukuyama literally called his titular work The End of History and the Last Man. Caveat emptor, this is the world they have helped create.
I don't expect anyone, least of all Eastern Europeans from former Warsaw Pact countries to love or even be friends with Russians, but if you have a neighbor you don't like it seems to me you have 4 choices: coexistence, fighting/calling 311 or 911 on them 24/7, you move, or they do. The later two are a bit difficult on a national level, so maybe there's only 2 choices, but I personally don't think anything is being accomplished by throwing an increasing number of young men in to the meat grinder, but that's just me; Russia is the aggressor, yes, but continuing an endless war only makes the oligarchs everywhere richer and bleeds both nations of it's youth.
Redpossum
Registered
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2014
- Messages
- 2,853
- Likes
- 2,803
argeiCanuck
Registered
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2023
- Messages
- 264
- Likes
- 166
It is illegal for Russia to prevent Ukraine from installing NATO military on the Ukraine side of the border. In their own sovereign country Ukraine should be able to do whatever they please.
Thrilled someone agrees with my post.
Thrilled someone agrees with my post.
Last edited:
- Status
| Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Argentina working with banks to expanding dollar lending | Articles | 0 | |
|
|
Central Bank is working to enable dollar debt cards | Articles | 9 | |
| R | Zelenskyy coming to Buenos Aires | Expat Life | 15 | |
| J | Tax Deductions working remotely in BA | Expat Life | 3 | |
|
|
Eight million Argentines of working age are jobless | Articles | 2 |