psflores said:
Being also a lawyer I Agee a 100 percent.
I want to ad that for tax purpuses is useful
The above was written in response to this:
gunt86 said:
I have provided for you what i know about the subject based upon numerous conversation with immigration lawyers in Argentina. None of what i have stated is based on hearsay or wild speculation on my part. I am done with providing information on this topic to this forum. It is abundantly clear to me that numerous misunderstanding have arisen on this topic primarily because of a lack of attention to terms. The words, 'resident', 'residency', 'continuous', and others are being treated with much different meanings by each participant in this discussion. Hence the confusion. You can take what i have provided (which i have also paid for by the way) and use it or you can go your own route. It is impossible to have any sort of meaningful discussion when the terms are not agreed upon - see Wittgenstein for more.
I don't think you have any idea what the ARG constitution "two years residency" concept means in terms of the practical reality of getting citizenship. Yes, according to the constitution only two years of residency are needed: where "residency" is left undefined. So of course a person can sue for citizenship by claiming that two years of physical presence meets the 'requirements' of the constitution. BUT, will you win? Maybe. There have been some successful cases in the past. But that does not mean your case will be successful. You may have to go all the way to the Supreme Court, and even then you might lose! Why would anyone do this except in the most desperate circumstances? As i said, if you want to try to sue the government based on what you think the constitution should be interpreted as, then please go ahead. I am not interested in such a gamble or difficult project, when it is much easier to follow the clear and simple path the government has provided towards citizenship.
It is absolutely ridiculous that Steve is even talking about suing the gvmt to get citizenship...this is the same person who refuses to pay for any legal advice and uses any opportunity to pump any lawyer for free legal advice. No amount of free legal advice is going to help you Steve, it actually costs a lot of money to sue the government.
I never replied to the insults in this post, but since it was quoted today, I think I will.
I suggest everyone read the first seven posts in this thread. I did not ask lawyers to respond in this thread, only those who had actually applied for citizenship. Gunt, who claimed to be a lawyer, was the first to reply. It was clear from the beginning that the first question he thought that needed to be answered was what actually constitutes two years residency in Argentina as applied to the requirements for obtaining citizenship. That actually was a very good question, especially for those who did not have a DNI and two years of permanent residency which, according to several sources (including Gunt), was a requirement for citizenship.
Gunt claimed to have done a lot of research on the subject but he was not capable of answering the initial question of this thread as he had not actually applied for citizenship and apparently he didn't know anyone who had, either...Just a bunch of lawyers he ostensibly paid for advice. And he did not indicate that even one of these lawyers had actually represented a single foreigner before the federal court in an attempt to obtain citizenship.
I can imagine a few circumstances when it would be necessary to use an "immigration" lawyer. One would be after you have been denied a visa or a renewal and received an order of deportation. Then I think it would be best to have a lawyer, not to appeal at migraciones, but to apply for citizenship. Of course it will also be necessary to use a lawyer to apply for citizenship if you go to the court to apply for citizenship and they do not even accept the application. I've always used the expressing "apply" for citizenship...never "sue" for citizenship. You apply at the federal court. Gunt introduced the word "sue" into this discussion, and he chose chose to ridicule me after I asked a question about it, completely twisting my question to scoff at the idea that I was the one who suggested suing the government.
Thanks to Dr. Rubilar we now know that some federal courts were (and some still may be) applying a law that was supposedly repealed almost 30 years ago. We also know that the word "inhabitant" is far more appropriate than resident when applying for citizenship. Migraciones uses the term resident in several different ways...transitoria, temporaria, and permanent. I have asked Dr. Rubilar a few questions in this thread, but not to provide free services to me. I didn't ask him to stay out of the discussion because he was a lawyer, but he had yet to win a case when he started posting in the thread.
I started this thread with these questions in mind: Are there any expats who have applied for and whether or not they were granted citizenship in Argentina? If so, what was
their experience?
I was interested in hearing from any
expat who had actually done do. One expat in another thread made it sound like he had done it all on his own but refused to answer any questions about the process...only making an obscure comment that his citizenship was dated in late December and he couldn't believe it.
He never offered an explanation, but I can guess that he was concerned that would make him liable to pay for Argentine taxes for that year....when he hoped not to have to pay them. It was his unwillingness to share any information about his experience applying for citizenship that provided the motivation for me to go ahead and apply for mine in February of 2011. ...and start the thread:
Argentine Citizenship for foreigners: Can it really be this easy?