That's pretty funny. Yeah, so what I mean about weak-minded are people who don't have the facts and/or ignore the facts.You mean to take Billions of Dollars from the "weak-minded" people to bail out the "hard-working" criminals of failed Big Banks for example?
That's pretty funny. Yeah, so what I mean about weak-minded are people who don't have the facts and/or ignore the facts.
The US Govt made a profit of $15.3 billion on the TARP program - which I assume is the "bail out" you refer to. The US Govt injected cash into the banks (the vast majority of which were smaller than $1B in assets) and in turn, received warrants in those banks. A few years later, the US Govt sold those warrants for a collective $15.3 billion profit. This profit was deposited directly into the US Treasury for the benefit of all taxpayers.
That's pretty funny..
It wasn't the content of your reply, it was the shrill, dramatic tone that I found funny.Nothing is funny about stealing Billions of public taxpayers to subsidize the thieves.
Real capitalism: "if you fail you die".
Talking about thieves "getting Billions for nothing".
Inflation during those years, minus food and fuel, was about 1%. Many of the banks were forced to issue the warrants, so they bought them back almsot immediately, meaning there was no opportunity for return. I'm not sure what you mean by "worse than any other investment..." There were hundreds of worse investments at that time.careful with those facts. there is plenty out there to suggest that if you adjust for inflation, TARP lost money. 15.3 billion over 6 years was 0.6% annually. worse than just about any other investment you could make with your money.
Inflation during those years, minus food and fuel, was about 1%. Many of the banks were forced to issue the warrants, so they bought them back almsot immediately, meaning there was no opportunity for return. I'm not sure what you mean by "worse than any other investment..." There were hundreds of worse investments at that time.
I´ll leave this one for you good conscience.the world needs more thieves.
It wasn't the content of your reply, it was the shrill, dramatic tone that I found funny.
Here is an excerpt from today's JP Morgan press release:
"JPMorgan Chase will continue to use its capital, people and
expertise to drive great outcomes for our communities. This quarter alone, we
announced two important programs that we believe will make a difference in the
long run – first, a $350 million New Skills at Work commitment focused on
preparing people to succeed in our transformed workplaces and in the changing
global economy."
If you describe a thief as someone who donates $350 million, then the world needs more thieves.