I am waiting to hear how we magically create those "international champions".
My feeling is you encourage smaller companies to grow.
Many of the really big international companies fill niches that are only big enough for one or two such companies per market segment.
Argentina is unlikely to suddenly hatch a serious competitor to microsoft-
But it could emulate Sweden, for example, which has a small, but active and profitable segment making high value added music software and hardware- a low cost startup industry, which does not require huge investments, but is steadily profitable.
Anyway, the problem I see is that regardless of who wins the election, Macri has spent the $52 Billion- and if you figure in all the government only debt, as Bianca Fernet roughly does in her current column in the Bubble, you see that any politician, "socialist" or not, is going to be short of dollars to pay already agreed upon debts, to the tune of at least $50 billion in the next few years. Add to that the dollar denominated private debt, and we are going to see a huge shortage of dollars available in the central bank to pay existing debt.
Exports, regardless of how much of the on paper profit goes to Fiat, are going to bring dollars into the central bank, which will relieve the pressure on the internal argentine economy. Currency Controls are coming, again, no matter who is in power, simply because the dollars have to come from somewhere. The IMF is not going to inject another $50 billion to pay itself back.
Every additional dollar in exports helps the situation, again, regardless of whose dollar it is. Every employee being paid in Argentina to make things for export helps the situation.
Also, far from all of Argentina's exports are from foreign owned firms. Just as the Starbucks here are locally owned Starbucks, rather than Seattle owned subsidiaries, many firms that are related to foreign firms are more heavily Argentine owned than similar subsidiaries in other countries. And there is a pretty large infrastructure of 100% Argentine owned family manufacturing firms- I met a guy a couple of years ago whose family owns the major pipe manufacturer in Argentina- no foreign owners. He exports. Same with most of the textile industry, the ceramics industry, the aluminum and non-ferrous casting industries, the shoe supply manufacturers, and on down the line. Family owned factories are the norm, not the exception. I know of family owned companies that make office chairs, lighting, silverware, toilets, faucets, wrenches, espresso machines, and dozens more light industrial products, most of which are not made in any other South American country except Brazil.
So I dont see how any and all exports, no matter how small, are somehow bad.
Little things, like the twenty or thirty million dollars a year in safety glass that Argentina exports, would only help matters if the government helped increase those sale to, say, $50 million dollars a year. Uruguay, Paraguay, Bolivia, Equador, Columbia- they all buy safety glass. Right now, some of it from us, some from China. Its heavy, and fragile- proximity and freight costs are significant market advantages- but they require husbanding and encouraging by the government.
Similar markets for other "small" industries in the $20 to $100 million dollar a year range exist, and can be grown.
No, its not the new Samsung- but its the realistic small increments that are going to make the difference, not the wishing for a unicorn.
The last time Kah was in power, soy was at very high prices- that is not the case today, and relying on taxing soy exports, or even doubling them, is not going to fix things, or bring in much in the way of dollars- most soy buyers are Chinese, and dont like to pay in dollars.