Changing Usd Before Or After The End Of The Month?

[Napoleon]

Yesterday i read that they "donated" 100.000 usd to a foundation of PRO. A brive perhaps?

Not a "bribe" so much as supporting the candidate who will be best for them. It's done all of the time in the States and elsewhere.

A bribe would be donating US100,000 to the K's now or waiting until PRO won in 2015 and then "donating" US$100,000.

Donating now is throwing your support behind the candidate who you think will help you the most, but there's no guarantee.

 

[Don Alberto]

http://www.cronista....40728-0062.html

Birdbrains like Arnaldo Bocco keeps "forgetting" that the full New York Court of Appeals approved Griesa's ruling.

 

[Bajo_cero2]

Birdbrains like Arnaldo Bocco keeps "forgetting" that the full New York Court of Appeals approved Griesa's ruling.

Did you get a "donation" too?

 

[ajoknoblauch]

Vultures play an important role in any healthy ecosystem.

 

[French jurist]

Birdbrains like Arnaldo Bocco keeps "forgetting" that the full New York Court of Appeals approved Griesa's ruling.

This is for the vulgum pecus, more complex than that (highest degree jurisdictions said that Griesa should resolve the issue about the different bonds, which he did not -so don't you-, in fact he has no clue about the case, which is sad).

 

[Don Alberto]

The Argentine government propaganda tells us that NML Capital, Ltd. bought their bonds a few years ago for next to nothing.

They also told us that the inflation 2008 through 2013 was app 10.5 percent per year.

The disputed bonds, issued by Argentina in February and July 2000, were purchased by NML between June 2001 and September 2003, at a little over half their face value of 172.153 million US$. The bonds were governed by New York law, resulting in a May 2006 U.S. judgment that Argentina owed NML the full value of the bonds plus 112 million US$ in unpaid interest, according to the ruling of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom.

Publication of Supreme Court decision on sovereign immunity in NML v Argentina (6 July 2011)
http://uk.practicallaw.com/8-506-7920

For the full report of this decision, see:
Legal update: No sovereign immunity in respect of enforcement of a foreign judgment (Supreme Court) (13 July 2011)
http://uk.practicallaw.com/8-506-8712

 

[Bajo_cero2]

The Argentine government propaganda tells us that NML Capital, Ltd. bought their bonds a few years ago for next to nothing.

They also told us that the inflation 2008 through 2013 was app 10.5 percent per year.

The disputed bonds, issued by Argentina in February and July 2000, were purchased by NML between 2001 and 2003, for about half their face value of 172 million USD. The bonds were governed by New York law, resulting in a 2006 U.S. judgment that Argentina owed NML the full value of the bonds plus 112 million in unpaid interest, according to the ruling of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom.

Publication of Supreme Court decision on sovereign immunity in NML v Argentina (6 July 2011)
http://uk.practicallaw.com/8-506-7920

For the full report of this decision, see:
Legal update: No sovereign immunity in respect of enforcement of a foreign judgment (Supreme Court) (13 July 2011)
http://uk.practicallaw.com/8-506-8712

For the vulpures's propanda we have you.

 

[dennisr]

Birdbrains like Arnaldo Bocco keeps "forgetting" that the full New York Court of Appeals approved Griesa's ruling.

If I may correct you, the appeals court did not rule concerning intermediaries. The appellate court found the issue premature and "a question for future proceedings," which I would believe is now.

 

[French jurist]

Another interesting post from US scholars (this time Mark Weidemaier, ass. Professor of Law at Univ. of NC / Chapell Hill)
http://www.creditslips.org/creditslips/2014/07/you-say-poignant-i-say-depressing.html

 

[ajoknoblauch]

For the vulpures's propanda we have you.

Presumably you mean https://openlibrary.org/subjects/person:nicolas_vulpure_de_littera_%28d._1387%29