Conspiracy Theory Reloaded

[internationalguy]

So many shoulds and shouldn'ts. Argentina should have learned from the first half dozen times they tried peronismo. Cattle shouldn't be fed corn. A plane shouldn't vanish during cruise flight with no warning or mayday call.

I wasn't debating fluoride, lol, I was simply stressing out the differences between two types of claims. Fluoride shouldn't be in water any more than idione in salt. Yet we get both. I'm not really sure how that's effective but whatever, fluoride won't kill anyone.

 

[Caliexpat]

fluoride won't kill anyone.

I'd say the science is still undecided on that one. There's no question that its toxic. The main issue is how do you control the dosage.

ADA study confirms dangers of fluoridated water, especially for babies
http://www.naturalnews.com/030123_fluoride_babies.html#ixzz2vnlXlM7z

Facts About Fluoridation
http://www.livescience.com/37123-fluoridation.html

Fluoridegate—Why is Poisoning of Children Considered a Valuable Public Health Policy?
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/02/16/fluoridegate-water-fluoridation.aspx

 

[Dublin2BuenosAires]

Flouride woowoo is good woowoo.

Doses in water are so small that it is categorically not toxic. Actually you would die due the dillution of the blood before the flouride killed you.

Its not doing an awful lot for dental health but it is not toxic nor making us stupider.

 

[citygirl]

But I think it's safe to say that flouride should not be in our water, especially since you cannot regulate how much water a person drinks thus what amount of flouride they are consuming.

Also, you're right about using common sense and thinking critically about any situation. For me, too many things just don't add up with the 9/11 attack. For example, none of the 4 black boxes survived the attack yet they managed to salvage a paper passport from one of the terrorists. Or how about the Bin Laden family being immediately flown out of the country.

Then you have the issue with the insider trading on American Airlines stock.

SEC: Government Destroyed Documents Regarding Pre-9/11 Put Options
http://www.washingto...ut-options.html

Or the Marvin Bush connection.

Bush-Linked Company Handled Security for the WTC, Dulles and United
http://www.commondre...s03/0204-06.htm

Obviously, there are many other legitimate items as well as dead ends but perhaps the most interesting is Building 7, which was the third tower to fall that day in NY, something most people have never heard of. It's difficult to imagine how a steel structured building that was not stuck by any airplane could free fall 7 seconds into its own footprint.

Compiled Footage of Building 7's Collapse

Actually it's not really difficult. 7 was in the footprint of #1 and #2 and was directly struck by the debris from the collapse of the towers. Additionally the sprinkler system and fire containment systems weren't working in #7 so the fires burned unchecked for 8+ hours which is obviously a situation that no one could have envisioned. Those 2 factors led to the collapse, it's really not that much of a stretch. But by all means, continue on with your conspiracy theories.

 

[scotttswan]

Obviously, there are many other legitimate items as well as dead ends but perhaps the most interesting is Building 7, which was the third tower to fall that day in NY, something most people have never heard of. It's difficult to imagine how a steel structured building that was not stuck by any airplane could free fall 7 seconds into its own footprint.

Compiled Footage of Building 7's Collapse

Do we have a building 7 truther here? :lol:

http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm

 

[Dublin2BuenosAires]

Flouride woowoo is good woowoo.

Doses in water are so small that it is categorically not toxic. Actually you would die due the dillution of the blood before the flouride killed you.

Its not doing an awful lot for dental health but it is not toxic nor making us stupider.

To be clear anything is toxic in large doses, water can kill you. Paracetemol, alcohol, eat enough fucking cheese and it'll put you in a box, why the special attention for flouride. It's a woo industry to put homeopathy to shame.

The woo is out there!

 

[Caliexpat]

Actually it's not really difficult. 7 was in the footprint of #1 and #2 and was directly struck by the debris from the collapse of the towers. Additionally the sprinkler system and fire containment systems weren't working in #7 so the fires burned unchecked for 8+ hours which is obviously a situation that no one could have envisioned. Those 2 factors led to the collapse, it's really not that much of a stretch. But by all means, continue on with your conspiracy theories.

Hey there's no reason to get nasty. You have your opinion, I have mine. If you can't play nice then don't play at all.

I don't believe that falling debris and fire can cause a steel structure to free fall into its own footprint in 7 seconds. A 32 story steel structure burned in Madrid for over 24 hrs in 2005 and did not collapse. Fire cannot cause a steel structure to collapse in the manner in which Building 7 fell. It takes a blast furnace with temperatures in excess of something like 1400 degrees F in order to melt steel.

But let's say you're right and the combination of falling debris and fire caused the building's structure to weaken, it still would not fall in the manner in which it did. It would fall in sections or pieces, one or multiple areas crumbling or tumbling down in an uneven fashion. What you see in the video is a uniform weakness across the entire structure of the building so that the entire building fell smoothly at the same rate at the same time. It is simply not possible without some other sort of missing piece of information we don't know about.

Just watch this video of other building demolitions and compare:

 

[Caliexpat]

Do we have a building 7 truther here? :lol:

http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm

I understand that this is the go to site for those who desire to debunk 9/11 truth. Of course, I've read what the page describes.

Any person can find multiple pieces of information on the web to "prove" or "disprove" a theory. The theories espoused on the website you posted are just that - theories, which are no more valid or invalid than mine. I go back to the international guy's post - one must use their own critical thinking and common sense in order to arrive what they deem to be the "truth" or "untruth".

 

[scotttswan]

I understand that this is the go to site for those who desire to debunk 9/11 truth. Of course, I've read what the page describes.

Any person can find multiple pieces of information on the web to "prove" or "disprove" a theory. The theories espoused on the website you posted are just that - theories, which are no more valid or invalid than mine. I go back to the international guy's post - one must use their own critical thinking and common sense in order to arrive what they deem to be the "truth" or "untruth".

But the important questions is did we ever land on the moon?!?!?!?!

WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!!!

 

[Caliexpat]

But the important questions is did we ever land on the moon?!?!?!?!

WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!!!

Well now you're just talking crazy.