This most likely does not have anything to do with the USA. This
sircreb thing is a local system of tax retention. Probably the account in question is used for a business that reports less sales than total amount of deposits to its bank account and this triggers a special treatment.
This is probably not applicable to a normal person with a regular savings account. So, I wouldn't make generalizations based on a single incident.
As I wrote in my post, Studiodio is having five percent retianed on his monthly deposits of about $200.000 ARS. It appears that they are the only deposits he makes and the source of the income is the Social Security Admn. of the USA, but I never thought what is happening actually has anything to do with the USA, except for the fact that's where the money he is depositing to his account comes from.
Studiodio didnot indicate that he has any kind of business, and if he doesn't, he's never reported any sales. I imagine that if, like me, he has a regular savings account, his monthly Sandanter Rio statements show the source of the funds deposited to his account is family assistance sent through Western Union. If he had to, I'm sure he could provide his US bank statements showing the motnhly deposits from the US Social Security Administration to prov the source of the funds.
I have never had any percentage of my transfers retained by my Santander Rio branch. The 5% may indeed be a local tax, as you indicate. but I wonder how it would apply to him if he does not operate any kind of business or has ever reported any business income. I would like to know more about hiis situation in case it happens to others so we will have an official explaination ready.
Perhaps he is being charged this tax because of a mistake, but it has happened to him five times and will probably continue to happen if he doen't actually question the validity of the tax being applied to him. I would question my bank if this ever happened to me and I wouldn't settle for 5% less because I was already getting a "damn good rate" (which it is) from Western Union. I live over ten kilometers from the closest Western Union agency, but as an economist (aka: economizer), I would certianly make the trip not to lose five percent each time I make a transfer.
And, like Studiodio, I would not have to wait in line at a Western Union Agency to get the ARS.
(If there was actuallly a line).
Studiodio's post can be found on the second page of the
Banking question thread:
i have been sending 1000 dollars converted to pesos via western union to my santander bank in cordoba for years now. about 5 months ago, i noticed that 5 percent was deducted right after pesos were deposited each month
Regimen de recaudacion sircreb z
Responsable:20211385376 / 5,00% sobre $213.500,00
i asked the bank about this and they said it was a tax and i could request a review. this is the amount i receive per month from SSI. <partly out of guilt over taking advantage of argentina´¨s financial problems, i have decided to let it be. with 5 percent deduction i am still getting a damn good rate without hassle of getting pesos directly from western union outlet.