Actually, that should reduce the fire (and conserve energy).
Ya somehow I don't think that's the intention.
Actually, that should reduce the fire (and conserve energy).
From my point of view the subsidies should be replaced by a 3 (or perhaps 4) tier system.... On the other hand, Argentina is in the exact opposite situation. Most of the energy subsidies here go to big businesses. For example, just take a stroll down Cabildo on any hot day and you will see hundreds of giant stores with their air conditioners on full blast and their doors wide open (or in the case of Rodo, no doors at all). As Napoleon points out, these companies need to quit mooching off the nanny state by getting subsidised energy. Meanwhile, those who most need the subsidies to survive should continue to receive them. ...
Watch it there Dublin. You keep on talking about cutting business subsidies in order to give teachers a raise, and the next thing you know you're in the Rooney Bunker gnawing on llama bones and singing La Internationale.
From my point of view the subsidies should be replaced by a 3 (or perhaps 4) tier system.
1. Below x units cost very little per unit
2. x to y units cost the net price of a unit
3. y to z units cost the net price per unit + n percent (to pay for tier 1)