OMG I had restrained myself from saying anything, but do any of "youpeople" know the difference between a positive and a negative right? I'm not even advocating either political view, but just to get the terminology right:
a negative right is the freedom not to be killed, the freedom not to be buggered, annoyed or impeded in anyway. The freedom to enjoy the fruit of your own making. Yes included in those, the freedom not to be harassed for conducting businesses in whatever currency.
This set of rights is derived, supposedly, from the God-given Nature of Man (Ayn Rand has some further justification about man using his mind to sustain himself which requires freedom, and she doesn't mention God)
a positive right is the right to clean water, shelter, contraceptives and free wifi.
This set of rights is ever expanding, are more properly called entitlements, and do not derive from anything natural or Godly except politicians and political ideology.
Again I'm not saying either set of rights is better or more legitimate but please, it's just..... too much BS