Bajo, why do you say that the Clarin published the tel number (0372) of the daughter? As I translate the linked Clarin article, it states that:
"Ercolini and Taiano proved that in October they exchanged text messages from the telephone 1164620372 in the name of Gils Carbó with 1136078008 in the name of Arfinsa. Gils Carbó said that his phone had been used by his daughter."
What does it mean to say this telephone info was "classified info on a secret criminal case and the prosecutors committed a crime by disclosing it? Do you have some substantiating authority for that proposition? What is a "secret" criminal case? "What is classified info" in this context? Lastly, you and (especially) I would never been in the position to publish classified info in a criminal case we were handling - that doesn't make sense to me.
p.s. What is the big deal about disclosing the tel number anyway? What is so hard to change the number to avoid unwanted calls? Aside from the fact that telephone calls made from that/Carbo's number are evidence in the case against Carbo, why is publication of the number so devastating? You don't want to be pestered by unwanted calls? Just change the number.